Is it reliable for Sakyamuni to realize the six divisions in the cycle of cause and effect?

It's unreliable. Buddhism can't explain where the first life was, so reincarnation hasn't started yet. But science has proved that this is wrong. Science does not directly prove whether there is reincarnation, but takes the "six paths" as a breakthrough. Without the "Six Paths", there would be no conditions for reincarnation among the six divisions in the wheel of karma. The center of the Six Classics is humanism and animal Taoism, that is, there must be creatures. The other four roads: Heaven Road, Xiuluo Road, Evil Ghost Road and Hell Road, are not in the real world, but they must be based on the real world. This is a problem, because science can prove that there were no animals and people on the earth at first, then there were creatures, and there was no earth in the universe at first, so "human" and "animal way" did not exist at first. If there is no living thing and no living thing, then the other "four ways" will be broken: who will go to hell if no one does evil? Who will become an evil ghost? No one does good, who will fly to "heaven"? Without the hatred for life and the will to fight, who will become a "shura"? Therefore, without the "two paths" of the real world, the "six paths" of Buddhism do not exist!