Namikaze Minato meituan takeout

A few days ago, Hungry posted a message on its official Weibo, saying that several cartoons posted by a comic blogger on WeChat official account changed all the warm-hearted events of Hungry Takeaway Brother in real life into Meituan Takeaway Brother. Hungry? With the help of the official Weibo platform, it is said that? Positive energy? It should be relayed, shouldn't it? Lever? . Every good thing should be advocated, not? Deal with it? .

So it's a comic book writer? Living a billion dollars a day? Recently, its official WeChat account released a number of cartoons with the theme of selling cute little brothers. The whole length of these cartoons uses the image of kangaroo ears, which has aroused public doubts about being hungry. By August 6, the comic book author? Living a billion dollars a day? In Weibo, I sent a response saying,? This incident made us hungry and wronged, and we sincerely apologize; In addition, this cartoon uses the small ears and logo with the characteristics of the US Mission without the authorization of the US Mission, and also makes the US Mission lie down. We sincerely apologize. ? In addition, this letter of apology also mentioned? Originally, I thought everyone was a respectable takeaway brother, and the color didn't matter. It seems that shopping malls are like battlefields, and plants are all soldiers? .

As soon as this apology came out, many netizens began to question the author's insincerity. In his cartoon, a group of takeaway brothers with kangaroo ears lift a car together 1 1 second to rescue a overturned woman, and there are stories about takeaway brothers taking a high-speed train to deliver milk tea, and stories about takeaway brothers who are physically disabled and determined. Without exception, the story of the younger brother was painted by the author as a takeaway brother of the US Mission. Color is not important. Every hard-working takeaway brother deserves respect, but are you hungry and the US delegation? Deadly enemy? From this point of view, it is hard to say that the outstanding deeds of employees will not affect hunger.

He said that he didn't think too much from the creator's point of view, but this was first of all a disrespect for the hungry little brothers who really did good deeds. I hope the author really realizes his mistake.