The public examination interview gave two scores, and the candidates questioned the examiner to change the scores at will.

A candidate in Zhanjiang questioned the examiner's random grading, and the reply from the relevant departments was caused by negligence.

The reporter received a report from Deng, a civil servant candidate in Zhanjiang, saying that she participated in the interview of civil servants in Zhanjiang on June 5438+02 and got two different results. Can the examiner change the score at will?

What is the truth of the matter? The reporter visited relevant personnel and parties.

I was asked to go back to the examination room to take the Level 2 exam.

Deng is from xuwen county. After taking the written examination of Guangdong civil servants on 20/0/0, she took part in the interview of Zhanjiang civil servants on the afternoon of May/0/2.

Deng said that she entered the examination room at about 1: 30 in the afternoon (note: one hour before the exam, candidates closed their books and drew lots to determine the order of the exam, and the real exam was at 2: 30). She was the second to enter the examination room and had an interview for about 10 minutes. "After the interview, the score on the interview notice sent to me was 78. 17. About 40 minutes after I left the examination room, someone claimed that the examiner called me and said, Because of the negligence of the staff, my score was wrong, so let me hurry back to the examination room and get a second-class result. About 30 minutes later, the other party sent a text message on the mobile phone saying, "XX candidates, due to the negligence of the staff, count the score of another candidate as your score. After examination, your interview score was 68.26. Please come to the interview room before May 4th16th to get the audited interview results. "

On June 17, this month, Deng came to Zhanjiang Kao Pei Office and asked the staff to clarify the mistakes in the score and ask where they were. But it was rejected by the staff, without giving her any explanation ... the staff was negligent and gave the wrong report card.

On the afternoon of this month 19, the reporter interviewed the relevant person in charge of Zhanjiang Human Resources and Social Security Bureau (hereinafter referred to as the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau) on the situation reflected by Deng.

A person in charge of Zhanjiang Human Resources and Social Security Bureau said that at about 2: 50 pm on June 12, Deng entered the examination room for an interview after the interview of the first candidate, and his answering time was short, only about 10 minutes. Regarding the notice of interview result (the result was 78. 17) sent to Deng by the bureau that afternoon, the relevant person in charge of Zhanjiang Municipal Bureau of Human Resources and Social Security explained: "This is caused by the negligence of our staff, and there is no problem of changing the result."

The person in charge said that when Deng left after the interview, the staff was busy counting the scores of the first candidate. "Because the examiner's score sheet of the first candidate has not been bound and put on the desktop, when the staff counted Deng's examiner's score sheet, they mistook it for Deng's statistics ..." Later, when the staff informed the examiner of the score of the second candidate (Deng) on the field, they found that Deng's score was the same as the first one, and everyone was suspicious, so the staff took out Deng's score.

The person in charge said that after learning this situation, he immediately asked a staff member surnamed Su to call Deng, telling her that there was something wrong with the result notice just sent, and asked her to return to the examination room to correct it. After listening, Deng said that she was on her way back to Xuwen by car, and the staff in the bureau could pay her the transportation fee and let her return to the examination room as soon as possible. But Deng disagreed. Finally, the staff had to send Deng Fa a short message 134 1363948 (reporter's note: the phone used for duty in the examination room), apologizing for the mistakes in her grades, and ordering her to go to the interview room before 4 pm on May 14 (note: Deng was in May/kloc-).

Zhanjiang Human Resources and Social Security Bureau also produced a complete collection of Deng's exams signed by examiners, and told Yangcheng Evening News reporter: "Her exams are all here and can stand the verification of higher authorities."

(China News Network)