The problems of demolition and resettlement housing emerge one after another. Why not build resettlement houses first and then demolish them?

First of all, the first point is that the government does not have so many existing houses in stock for the relocated households to choose from. Moreover, under the background of land finance, in some places, it is more cost-effective to give money than to give a house, and people who collect money also know how to calculate this account. Secondly, the second point is that developers will not build a large number of cheap resettlement houses, which is not in line with the fundamental commercial law of businessmen seeking profits. The profit rate of resettlement housing and commercial housing is completely different. Third, third, the law does not clearly stipulate that relocated households must choose existing houses for property rights exchange. There is no legal basis.

Finally, the fourth point, from the collection process, time can't catch up. Demolition time is often not too long. From project establishment to collection, it is very fast. Moreover, no one can guarantee that the project will be approved before obtaining the approval of land acquisition. In this case, who dares to blindly build resettlement houses?

I think it will be beneficial to our relocated households if the demolition party completes the resettlement house before demolition. First of all, it can avoid the problem that resettlement houses cannot be cashed. It is common to see no resettlement houses for seven or eight years after demolition. In reality, many relocated households have not seen the shadow of resettlement houses for three or four years or even seven or eight years after demolition. The agreed resettlement finally became a luxury.

The second is to choose existing houses directly and try to avoid the quality problems of resettlement houses. This is another situation. One or two years after the demolition, the resettlement house was built, but the relocated households found that there were quality problems such as cracks in the wall of the resettlement house and were afraid to move in.

Finally, the living conditions after the demolition are unstable and the relocation is troublesome. This is also a realistic problem. Often after demolition, according to the normal construction progress of resettlement houses, it will take one or two years, or even three years. In the meantime, if there is no revolving room, the relocated households will have to rent a house outside. Anyone who has moved home knows how troublesome it is to move beds, sofas, televisions, tables and chairs, pots and pans, and all kinds of clothes and supplies.