According to the law of China, what should the captain do? Is the captain right or wrong? Please refer to the supplementary question for details. Thank you for your answers.

1, China's criminal law is biased towards justice. Justice means that a person gets what he deserves. Emergency avoidance must not be at the expense of infringing on the right to life of others, even if it is to save his own life or the life of others. So the captain is obviously wrong and should be convicted of intentional homicide.

2. Posner (economic analysis of law) thinks that the captain's practice is not necessarily inefficient from the perspective of efficiency. If Parker was doomed to die, but the captain only accelerated the speed of death and saved three lives, then the social benefits far outweigh the illegal social costs, so the captain should not be held accountable.

3. Judging from the deterrence of criminal law, the punishment of the captain can't avoid the occurrence of similar things in the future, so the punishment of the captain is meaningless.