Comprehensive evaluation random sampling method
The comprehensive evaluation random sampling method is a method that quantifies the bidding quotation, supervision outline and bidders' credit, gives relative weight scores, selects a certain proportion of the best bidders, and randomly selects the winning bidder according to the scores from high to low. The comprehensive evaluation random sampling method does not guarantee the bidder with the highest score or the lowest bid price to win the bid.
I. Composition of evaluation factor scores
(a) tender offer 15 points
1, bid evaluation benchmark price: bid evaluation benchmark price = excluding the arithmetic average of the highest bid price and the lowest bid price.
2. Deviation rate = | Bidder's quotation-bid evaluation benchmark price |/bid evaluation benchmark price × 100%.
3. Bid quotation score: 15- deviation rate × 100.
(2) Supervision outline 40 points
1, 5 points for quality control objectives and measures. 2 points for clear control objectives, 1 point is basically clear, and 0 point is unclear; Control measures are feasible 3 points, basically feasible 1.5 points, and infeasible 0 points.
2, safety control objectives and measures 5 points. 2 points for clear control objectives, 1 point is basically clear, and 0 point is unclear; Control measures are feasible 3 points, basically feasible 1.5 points, and infeasible 0 points.
3, schedule control objectives and measures 5 points. 2 points for clear control objectives, 2 points for basic clarity and 0 point for unclear control objectives; Control measures are feasible 3 points, basically feasible 1.5 points, and infeasible 0 points.
4, investment control objectives and measures 5 points. 2 points for clear control objectives, 1 point is basically clear, and 0 point is unclear; Control measures are feasible 3 points, basically feasible 1.5 points, and infeasible 0 points.
5. Monitor the difficulties and key points of the project, and get 4 points. According to the characteristics of the project, the analysis of difficulties and key points is reasonable 2 points, average 1 point, and unreasonable 0 point; 2 points for effective monitoring measures, 1 point for general monitoring measures, and 0 point for ineffective monitoring measures.
6, the key parts of the station supervision plan 3 points. 3 points for complete and feasible scheme, basically complete and feasible scheme 1.5 points, and 0 point for incomplete and infeasible scheme.
7. 3 points for rationalization proposal of this project. Reasonable suggestion 3 points, basically reasonable 1.5 points, unreasonable 0 points.
8, clear division of labor, clear responsibilities 4 points. According to the characteristics of the project, the division of labor is feasible and the rights and responsibilities are clear; 4 points; 2 points if the division of labor is clear and the powers and responsibilities are clear; Unclear division of labor, unclear powers and responsibilities, 0 point.
9. 3 points for contract and information management. There is an assessment system, the responsibility lies with people, large-scale projects are managed by special personnel, small and medium-sized projects have part-time staff, and modern management means such as computer information management system are used. 3 points; Responsibility is not in place and management is backward; 0 points; Other circumstances are scored as appropriate.
10, 3 points for instruments and office facilities. 3 points for meeting the needs of the project; If the key equipment is missing 1 piece, deduct 1 point until 3 points are deducted.
(3) The credit score of the bidder is 45 points.
1, bidder (18 points)
(1) 9 points for similar projects. Supervision of similar and above projects in the past five years, and the completion acceptance is 3 points; The project won the national quality award plus 3 points, the provincial quality award plus 2 points, and the municipal quality award plus 1 point; The project won 3 points for the national construction safety standardization site, 2 points for the provincial safety civilization standardization site, and 1 point for the municipal safety civilization standardization site. Award-winning and safety civilized construction site bonus points are scored with the highest score, not cumulative.
(2) 3 points for advanced supervision enterprises. Last year, it won 3 points for national advanced supervision enterprises and 2 points for provincial advanced supervision enterprises; City advanced supervision enterprise 1 minute.
(3) 2 points for quality assurance system. Establish a quality assurance system and pass the third-party quality system certification unit certification 2 points; The established quality assurance system failed to pass the certification of the third-party quality system certification unit (1); No quality assurance system has been established; 0 points.
(4) 4 points for market behavior. If the conclusion of dynamic evaluation of enterprise qualification is within the validity period, 4 points are qualified and 2 points are basically qualified; Market behaviors with bad behavior records in the past 1 year are not scored, and 1 point is deducted from the bidder's total score every time until 0 point. In recent 1 year, in the process of supervision bidding, the market behavior that was corrected or investigated because of fraudulent bidding won the bid did not score, and 2 points were deducted from the total score of bidders every time until 0 point was deducted.
2. Chief supervision engineer (total score 14)
(1) 8 points for similar projects. In the past five years, he has served as the chief supervision engineer or director representative of similar and above engineering supervision projects, and passed the completion acceptance, adding 2 points. The project won the national quality award plus 3 points, the provincial quality award plus 2 points, and the municipal quality award plus 1 point; The project won 3 points for the national construction safety standardization site, 2 points for the provincial safety civilization standardization site, and 1 point for the municipal safety civilization standardization site. Award-winning and safety civilized construction site bonus points are scored with the highest score, not cumulative.
(2) Excellent supervision engineer 3 points. In the last year, he won 3 points from the national excellent supervision engineer; Provincial excellent supervision engineer 2 points; Excellent supervision engineer 1.
(3) 3 points for market behavior. 2 points will be deducted for those who have served as the director of 1 projects under construction, and 4 points will be deducted for those who have served as the director of two projects under construction. In the past 1 year, if the administrative department of housing and urban-rural construction records bad behaviors due to professional negligence, the market behavior will not score, and 1 point will be deducted from the total score of the chief supervision engineer every time until 0 point.
3, professional supervision engineer (total score 13)
(1) 5 points for staffing. The number of supervisors who meet the requirements plus 5 points.
(2) 5 points will be deducted in other cases. Among the professional supervision engineers, 1 person with national registration qualification was awarded 1 point (excluding the director); With provincial registration qualification, a plus 0.5 points; Professional supervision engineer (excluding the director) won the title of National Excellent Supervision Engineer 1 person in the last year, and got 1 point; Get the title of provincial excellent supervision engineer, 1 person plus 0.8 points; Get the title of municipal excellent supervision engineer, 1 person plus 0.5 points; According to the professional needs of this project, if one of the on-site supervisors is equipped with professional equipment (civil engineering, municipal administration, water supply and drainage, strong and weak electricity, cost, heating and ventilation), score 0.5; The score of this item shall not exceed 5 points.
(3) 3 points for market behavior. Sending professional supervision personnel without registered qualifications, the market behavior does not score, and each person will be deducted from the total score of professional supervision engineers 1 point. In the past year, due to professional negligence, it was recorded in the record of bad behavior by the administrative department of housing and urban-rural construction, and the market behavior did not score. Every time, 1 point was deducted from the total score of professional supervision engineer until 0 point was deducted.
Second, the review requirements
1. The contract (agreement), letter of acceptance (filing) and completion acceptance certificate of the same project shall prevail for similar projects of the bidder and the project leader, and other certificates shall be invalid.
2. Similar projects refer to projects with the same structure and similar scale.
3, the project award and credibility to the administrative department of housing and urban construction or its entrusted social organizations selection documents and online publication shall prevail, other certificates are invalid.
4. Bad behavior refers to the behavior that the main body of the construction market violates the laws, regulations, rules, norms, standards and normative documents on construction projects promulgated by the state and the province, and is notified by the administrative department of housing and urban and rural construction or published online, and other supporting materials are not used as the basis.
5. Copies of certificates and certificates required for review shall be clearly included in the bidding documents.
Third, the determination of the winning candidate.
The bidder's total score is divided into the sum of the bid quotation score, the supervision outline score and the credit score of the bidder and the personnel of the project supervision institution.
The bid evaluation committee recommends three successful candidates to the tenderer according to the order of the scores from high to low. The tenderer and the bidder shall confirm the evaluation results and determine the successful candidate.
Four, random sampling operation steps
1, the tenderer shall determine the order of drawing corresponding figures according to the order of bidding documents submitted by the winning candidate or the comprehensive evaluation score.
2. The legal representative of the candidate winning the bid or his entrusted agent shall publicly extract the number representing the bidder, and the tenderer shall publicly disclose the bidder corresponding to each number.
3. The tenderer randomly selects a number in public, and the bidder corresponding to the number is the winning bidder, and the tenderer and the winning bidder shall sign for confirmation.