Pre-schedule of bid evaluation method
Klausen didn't. Evaluation criteria of evaluation factors
2. 1. 1 shape
style
criticize
examination
mark
The name of the potential bidder is consistent with the business license, qualification certificate and safety production license.
The signature and seal shall meet the requirements of Item 3.7.3 of Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The number of copies shall meet the requirements of Item 3.7.4 of Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
Binding shall comply with the requirements of Item 3.7.5 of Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The page number and the number of the small label shall comply with the provisions of Article 10. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The format of the bid documents conforms to the requirements of Chapter 8 "Format of Bid Documents" and Chapter 2 "Instructions to Bidders", item 3.7. 1.
There can only be one valid quotation, that is, it meets the requirements of Article 10.3 of Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
Conclusion (pass/fail), if one of them fails, the conclusion is not passed.
Klausen didn't. Evaluation criteria of evaluation factors
2. 1.2
money
style
criticize
examination
mark
The quasi-business license has a valid business license.
Safety production license has a valid safety production license (except landscaping and elevator installation)
The qualification grade is in accordance with the provisions of item 1.4. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The financial status is in line with the provisions of item 1.4. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The performance of similar projects conforms to the provisions of item 1.4. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The reputation is in accordance with the provisions of Item 1.4. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The project manager meets the requirements of item 1.4. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
Other requirements shall be in accordance with item 1.4. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
There is nothing in item 3.2 in the bidding requirements.
Conclusion (pass/fail), if one of them fails, the conclusion is not passed.
Klausen didn't. Evaluation criteria of evaluation factors
2. 1.3 responsiveness evaluation
examination
mark
The contents of the quasi-bidding documents are in accordance with the provisions of Item 1.3. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The construction period is in accordance with the provisions in Item 1.3.2 of Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The quality of the project conforms to the provisions in Item 1.3.3 of Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The validity period of the bid shall comply with the provisions of Item 3.3. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The bid bond complies with the provisions of Item 3.4. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The rights and obligations comply with the provisions of Chapter IV "Terms and Forms of Contract"
The priced bill of quantities conforms to the scope and quantity given in Chapter 5 "Bill of Quantities" and the requirements for bidders in the "Description".
The technical standards and requirements conform to the provisions of Chapter VII "Technical Standards and Requirements"
The fee shall be determined according to the provisions in Article 10.4 of Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The maximum bid price (revised price) shall not exceed the maximum bid price specified in Item 7.3. 1 of Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
Conclusion (pass/fail), if one of them fails, the conclusion is not passed.
Klausen didn't. Evaluation criteria of evaluation factors
2. 1.4 architecture
organization
design
Summation term
Ocular canal
Manage the machine
Construction evaluation
Bid estimation
Quasi-construction scheme and technical measures The construction scheme and measures are comprehensive, reasonable and feasible.
The quality management system and measures system are complete and reasonable, and the measures are comprehensive and feasible.
The safety management system and measures system are complete and reasonable, and the measures are comprehensive and feasible.
The environmental protection management system and measures system are complete and reasonable, and the measures are comprehensive and feasible.
The project schedule plan and measures plan are reasonable, meet the needs of the total project period, and the measures are comprehensive and feasible.
The resource allocation scheme meets the engineering requirements.
The technical person in charge shall comply with the provisions of item 1.4. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
Other key personnel shall meet the requirements of item 1.4. 1 in Chapter II "Instructions to Bidders".
The construction equipment meets the engineering requirements.
The test and detection instruments and equipment meet the engineering requirements.
Conclusion (feasible/infeasible), if one of them is infeasible, the conclusion is infeasible.
Quantification standard of quantitative factors of clause number
2.2 details
filmy
criticize
examination
mark
If the bidder of the project specified in the bill of quantities is omitted from the quasi-unit price and there is no quotation, it is deemed that the bidder has promised the tenderer free of charge, or its expenses are deemed to have been apportioned in the unit price (price) of other related subheads in the bill of quantities.
The payment terms shall be in accordance with the provisions of the special contract terms 17.
Evaluation criteria of commercial bid ① Bid evaluation method: the method of winning the bid by drawing lots at a reasonable low price after evaluation.
(2) According to the calculation principle of the bid evaluation office, it is impossible to calculate the average bid price (C value) of the bidder (that is, the average bid price of the bidder is zero), which shows that the bid price of the bidder has deviated from the purpose of bidding activities and the principle of bid evaluation and calibration of this bid evaluation method, and this tender has failed.
Determination of collusive bidding
In any of the following circumstances, it shall be deemed as collusive bidding:
1. The contents of bidding documents of different bidders are unusually consistent; 2. The errors and omissions in the bidding documents of different bidders are consistent;
3. Different bidders' bid quotations or quotations have abnormal, consistent or regular changes;
4. The bidding documents of different bidders are compiled by the same unit or individual;
5. The members of the project management team specified in the bidding documents of different bidders appear the same person;
6. The bidding documents of different bidders are confused with each other;
7. The bidding documents of different bidders are compiled by the same computer;
8. Different bidders authorize the same person to bid;
9. The bidder pays the bid bond for other bidders;
10. Different bidders employ the same person to provide technical or economic consulting services for their bids, unless the project subject to tender itself requires the use of proprietary technology.
…… ……
comment