Separation of bid evaluation, that is, the "bid evaluation by the bid evaluation committee" and "bid selection by the tenderer" in the bidding procedure are separated into two relatively independent links. In fact, in the current bidding system, bid evaluation and bid selection are separated, and the concept of "bid evaluation separation" actually emphasizes changing the decisive role of bid evaluation experts in bid evaluation and bid selection, thus highlighting the bid inviter's bid selection right.
The so-called "separation of bid evaluation" is to change the previous practice that all bid evaluation and calibration are decided by bid evaluation experts, mainly highlighting the tender's right to choose the best among the best, that is, the evaluation opinions of the bid evaluation Committee are only used as a reference for bidding and calibration, and the tender has the decision-making right to vote to determine the winning bidder according to regulations.
The role of "evaluation separation"
"Separation of bid evaluation" is intended to solve many problems in the field of bidding. In the stage of bid evaluation and calibration, the bid evaluation committee has the right to bid evaluation discretion and calibration suggestion, and the tenderer has the right to participate in bid evaluation and calibration decision-making, which complement each other. However, in practice, there is a tendency that the bid evaluation result is equal to the bid winning result, and the owner's calibration is replaced by expert calibration.
On the one hand, the power of the bid evaluation committee is greater than its responsibility. The bid evaluation experts have greater discretion, but they cannot bear the hidden responsibilities behind their rights, and the tenderee bears the legal consequences of their bid evaluation behavior. On the other hand, it is not conducive to the implementation of the "responsibility system for tenderers": the tenderer's willingness to choose the best is not fully reflected, and the expert's decision to win the bid can easily become a "shield" for tenderers to evade their responsibilities. At the same time, the unfair scoring and power rent-seeking of individual bid evaluation experts will also lead to long-standing "stubborn diseases" in the field of bidding, such as linking, colluding with bidding, enclosing bids, and openly inviting and secretly deciding.
The Bid Evaluation Model redefines the attribution of responsibility and right in bid evaluation and calibration, aiming at solving various problems caused by the dislocation of power and responsibility.
How many calibration methods are there for bid evaluation separation?
After the bid evaluation committee completes the bid evaluation, the tenderer needs to complete the calibration within the specified time. Some tenderers entrust the bid evaluation committee to directly determine the winning bidder, while others determine the winning bidder by themselves after the bid evaluation is completed, that is, the bid evaluation is separated. The common calibration methods are: lottery calibration method, price competition calibration method, ticket determination calibration method, lottery calibration method and collective calibration method.
1. Ranking and calibration method: according to the ranking recommended by the bid evaluation committee, the winning candidate ranked first is determined to win the bid; If the winning candidate who ranks first gives up winning the bid, the winning candidate who ranks second determines winning the bid, and so on.
2. Bidding mode: In this mode, the bidder determines the transaction price and the bidder does not bid. Among all applicants, the winning bidder is determined by random drawing. Advantages: the bidding procedure is simple, and there is no risk and pressure of clean government. Disadvantages: neither choose the best among the best, nor bid. Suggestion: From the point of view of daring to take responsibility or being responsible for construction projects, it is not recommended to adopt the method of direct lottery for bidding projects.
3. Price competitive calibration method: This method refers to the method based on the bid price, and the specific method is agreed by the tenderer in the tender documents. This method can be extended to a variety of calibration methods, such as the lowest tender price method, the second lowest price method, the n (pre-agreed quantity) low price method, the average value method and so on. Advantages: the bidding procedure is simple and there is bidding. Disadvantages: no merit function. Suggestion: some small or technically simple projects can be adopted, but it is not recommended to adopt the price competition law (such as the lowest price method) which may lead to vicious bidding. The average method or the nth lowest price winning bid will be relatively reasonable.
4. Calibration method: This method refers to the method that bidders set up a calibration committee to determine the winning bidder by direct voting or round-by-round voting. There are simple majority one-time voting method or pairwise comparison sorting method for direct voting. Advantages: excellent selection function and certain bidding function. Disadvantages: The integrity pressure of the main person in charge of the bidder and the integrity risk of the selection committee are great. Suggestion: Major projects or technically complex projects can be used, and general projects should be used with caution.
5. Voting method: This method refers to the method that the tenderer forms a bid evaluation committee, determines no less than three bidders by voting, and then determines the winning bidder by random drawing. The more bidders who are shortlisted by voting, the weaker the merit-based function. Advantages: it can reduce the price appropriately and select the best, and there is no great risk and pressure of clean government. Disadvantages: Bidders with good internal control mechanism can realize the organic combination of selection and bidding, while bidders with poor internal control mechanism do not reflect pricing and integrity risks. Suggestion: Generally, the price of the bidding project is determined in advance, and then the best bidder is selected. Major projects or projects with complex technology will be shortlisted by raising prices, and the best projects will be selected first. Deyang communications
6. Collective deliberation method: This method means that the legal representative or principal responsible person of the tenderee is the person in charge of the bid evaluation committee, and the bid evaluation committee is formed for collective deliberation, and the members of the bid evaluation committee express their opinions, and finally the person in charge of the bid evaluation committee determines the bid evaluation method of the winning bidder. The essence of this method is to give the legal representative or principal responsible person of the bidder the right to bid. Advantages: The legal representative or principal responsible person of the bidder has the right to bid, which can be the selection or bidding, or the organic combination of selection and bidding. Disadvantages: the legal representative or principal responsible person of the bidder is under great personal pressure and the risk of clean government is great.
Suggestion: If the tenderer does not have perfect collective rules of procedure to avoid risks and relieve the pressure of clean government, it is not recommended to adopt collective rules of procedure.
For more information about project/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, please click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd