1. Dreams are unconscious behaviors.
I have to ask this question first, which is related to the justice of the law and many other issues. According to Freud's theory, "dreaming is a subjective intention", I don't agree. In my opinion, dream is a special ideological activity formed by people in a shallow sleep state, an "incomplete thinking" formed by people in a "half-asleep and half-awake" state, and a continuation of a "complete thinking" formed by people in a awake state. That is, the behavior of dreams comes from a series of thinking activities before dreams, and it is an unconscious behavior completely controlled by external factors. In order to prove my point, I want to use a few examples and discuss according to these examples.
Freud once gave an example-sleepwalking. According to sleepwalking, he came to the conclusion that "dreaming is a subjective intention". Here, I want to give a few other examples. For example, if you are in cold conditions, you will have dreams like snow and ice. This example may be far-fetched. Let me give another well-known example. As we all know, in a dream, another person asks him a question. If he answers in a dream, then his answer must be true, but if he is awake, he may not answer like this. The above two examples are enough to prove that dreams are an unconscious behavior and a passive acceptance of external factors. Regarding Freud's example of sleepwalking, I think sleepwalking is a disguised expression of psychological activities before dreams, which belongs to the continuation of "complete thinking", so Freud's theory of "subjective intention" is obviously untenable.
2. Dreams are a self-defense response of human beings.
Dream is a kind of thinking of human beings, and it also follows a law of thinking. Those seemingly absurd dreams are actually a self-defense reaction of people. For example, in a dream, you are attacked, but you are unscathed. This impossible thing became possible in a dream. At first glance, it seems to be divorced from the usual thinking law of human beings, but it also confirms another thinking law of human beings-the instinctive reaction of self-defense.
Usually when we are attacked, we will instinctively do some self-defense behaviors, and dreams also follow this law. It is seamlessly combined with people's thinking and expressed in the form of "unconscious self-defense" to meet the bottom line that people can bear psychologically in the subconscious. It is a kind of psychological protection that people seek for themselves in the subconscious. Although the two concepts of psychology and physiology are completely separated in dreams, dream thinking is based on them at the same time. That is, some physiological characteristics of people (such as heart rate) are regulated by the operation of this subconscious mind, which will fully cooperate with people's physiological reactions, thus achieving the purpose of "unconscious self-defense." I think this may be the reason why people don't cause mental illness and mental illness because of a single dream. Psychological and mental illness caused by dreaming is the result of memories after people wake up.
Thus, dreams and people's physiology and psychology complement each other, so Freud's view that dreams may directly lead to some diseases is untenable.
3. Dream is a kind of thinking in the subconscious.
No dream can be completely divorced from reality, and every dream has some connection with reality more or less. Including those absurd dreams, although they are far from reality, if you understand them from an abstract point of view, you will find that dreams are vaguely related to some things in reality.
Many dreams are based on people's future or past, and it is absurd to express this theme in a special form of dreams. According to Freud's view, "dreams are the realization of wishes", and he linked this "absurd reality" with "wishes". I think this view is far-fetched. If dreams are the fulfillment of wishes, what about those dreams that end in tragedy?
In fact, this dream is just a subconscious thinking. When people participate in the special environment of "dreams" under this condition of "subconscious thinking", they have evolved into various forms of dreams. People put this kind of thinking into practice in a special way under this special condition, and then draw a positive, negative or noncommittal conclusion through an "unconscious judgment" (that is, the progress of dreams). The representative symbols of this conclusion are comedy, tragedy or mixed feelings. The result of the dream represents the conclusion that people make this kind of "subconscious judgment" on one or several things. This argument is only aimed at a complete dream, and an incomplete dream may not necessarily have these three results. )
4. Intermittence and completeness of dreams
Many dreams of extreme excitement, anxiety or horror often wake people up in their dreams, which is also a self-defense reaction. In order to make people's psychology or physiology not fall below a "safe bottom line", this discontinuity becomes a necessity. Therefore, this dream is still a complete dream. This view is completely contrary to Freud's explanation of "a complete dream".
A dream disturbed by external conditions is not a complete dream, but if it is interrupted based on the dream itself, it is a complete dream. Many people will ask all kinds of questions about this. And I think the explanation is very simple, that is, this "interruption" is caused by the dream itself, so this "interruption" should belong to the "subconscious behavior" of the dream. For this dream, this interruption is a subjective intention, that is, it is the expression of the true thoughts in the dream. At this time, the dream thinking has made the final judgment on this behavior. Therefore, we have no reason not to end this dream.
Therefore, does my point of view contradict my point of view that "a complete dream will have a conclusion"? Here, I want to explain to you that even this "interrupted dream" will draw a conclusion between affirmation, denial or noncommittal, and this conclusion is not necessarily "noncommittal". Of course, the conclusion of dreams is not like our "conscious thinking", and we will definitely come to a clear conclusion. The conclusion drawn by this special way is not necessarily obvious, which requires us to analyze different dreams from different angles, and this analysis is based on the psychological changes and dream behavior of each link in the dream.
Space is limited, so I can't describe them all here. I believe that after reading these, you will definitely have a brand-new understanding of dreams.