China's chess system should be revised. Do you agree?

Let me tell you a story. There are 26 letters, and the number of randomly arranged types is much more than the total number of states of the third-order Rubik's cube, but it is much more difficult to reset the third-order Rubik's cube than these 26 letters. It is precisely because of this that the reset of the third-order Rubik's Cube is much more exciting and interesting.

The rules of chess are the same. If the general is not in Jiugong and looks advanced, then many residual chess theories will be changed and individual soldiers will not win. If a general is as powerful as a car, it is more like a king, but how can he be killed?

There are many such considerations. I want to make it clear that it is not a simple matter to make a reasonable rule. If you want to change it, it may not be as good as before.

Your opinion is mainly influenced by chess. You know, to change China's chess in this way, it is better to play chess directly, or to invent a new kind of chess, and mix China's chess with chess.

In fact, I also want to have a new kind of chess, more arms, a bigger chessboard, and the rules of keeping pace with the times. But this kind of chess is also difficult to be recognized by the public.