1. physiognomy is a Taoist "technique", that is, reading palms, faces, geomantic omen, touching bones and measuring characters. . . . And so on, all based on the understanding and application of Zhouyi gossip. A Buddhist, especially one who is profound enough to be called a "guru" (monk), is unlikely to concentrate on non-religious "technology". Of course, it does not rule out that he is so profound and knowledgeable. . . . At least I haven't seen it among Tibetan Buddhist monks in Inner Mongolia.
2. Monks who accepted the Ten Commandments left the temple for two purposes: pilgrimage and preaching. Lamas in temples live on incense money (giving alms), so lamas who leave temples should generally live on giving alms. But authentic monks don't take the initiative to ask others to give alms.
The biggest doubt of this man is that he doesn't have a temple, so where did he get his precepts? Where did you get this "Dudi"? Without these two, his identity is simply untenable in religion.
3. Is the Lama still practicing double cultivation? ! Anyone who has received formal sex education can see the absurdity of "techniques" such as reconciling yin and yang, collecting yin and supplementing yang. This kind of thing does not exist. Yuan Shundi Tuohuan timur has a record of practicing this technology in history (the most precious). At that time, the Lama said that this technology could prolong life, but didn't Yuan Shundi live for 50 years? In addition, these techniques have been lost in the official history after the Yuan Dynasty, so even if they exist, they should not be an unidentified person.
But Tibetan Buddhism is Mahayana Buddhism, which is characterized by indulgence, which is the biggest feature compared with Chinese mainland's Mahayana Buddhism. According to what you said, he lied when he made it clear.
4. Gas field. . . . Non-religious, good is supernatural, bad is to cheat foreign devils. Tibetan Buddhism stresses cultivation, but even magic is never called "aura".
In a word, there are too many suspicious places in this man's actions, which are deceptive. I have an idea. If you have time, you can ask him the following questions by yourself or your friends in a curious tone:
1. Do you have a master's degree? To what extent
2. Has the master studied the Tripitaka?
3. Where is the master's master from?
4. How many branches of Lamaism are there?
The above is the most basic common sense of Lamaism. If he is hesitant or insincere when you ask these questions, then there is no doubt that he is fake!
It is the most shameless behavior to use the characteristics of religion to pretend to be a missionary to deceive people. If this man is false, he will be cursed, which is why I answer you.