This is just superstition. Being smart depends on aptitude and genetics, and has nothing to do with which zodiac sign your father is. Because among the students in each class, there are those who are good at learning and those who are poor at learning. Their parents are also of the same age. This is a self-deception.
I have a relative who was born in the year of the Horse. However, I don’t know why, but their children were born stupid, and they gave birth to two children in a row. Later, they adopted a girl, and then there were no children. I want to have more children, raise them until the two children do not grow up to adulthood, and support the girl to go to college. Now she is living a good life.
Whether a child is smart or not has nothing to do with the zodiac sign. After all, there are celebrities of various zodiac signs now. Among them are wealthy people, academic masters, and beautiful and handsome boys. These have nothing to do with their parents. The inheritance of children is related to their acquired efforts and has nothing to do with the zodiac sign. The births of zodiac signs are all average. There are basically so many people born every year. The talents of such children are also different, and the talents of their children in the future will also be different. It's definitely different.
So, the zodiac sign does not determine whether a person’s children are smart or not. How smart their parents’ IQ is, how smart they will be if they inherit it. A fool born in the year of the Horse will The child must also be a fool, unless he is not his own flesh and blood.
Placing your hope on the zodiac sign is better than following the doctor’s advice during pregnancy and giving your child more food that promotes brain development while he is still in the womb. Superstition should be more reliable. After all, many foods are based on science. Being superstitious about zodiac animals is just deceiving yourself.