Some questions about the arson of Hangzhou nanny? The person who seeks three views is the correct answer.

Hangzhou nanny arson is, after all, a man-made arson. If the laws and regulations are amended because of this extremely accidental case, the fire-fighting cost of the house will be raised, and even disputes between opposing owners will arise, there will be certain deviations.

In fact, many residential fires can be avoided in advance except for very accidental arson, because although the fire may be sudden, the hidden danger of the fire is fixed. In fact, it is more meaningful to eliminate these hidden dangers in advance and learn the ability of self-help and escape in an emergency than to discuss whether to force the installation of automatic fire extinguishing systems in residential rooms.

At about 5: 00 am on June 22nd, 20 1 July, Beijing time, an arson case occurred in Room1Unit 1802, Building 2, Blue Qianjiang Community, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, killing four people (one mother and three underage children). On July 1 2065438, Hangzhou Public Security Bureau approved the arrest of Mo Huanjing, a suspect suspected of arson and theft, according to the decision of Hangzhou People's Procuratorate to approve the arrest. On August 2, 20654381day, Hangzhou Procuratorate prosecuted the defendant Mo Huanjing according to law.

On September 2, 2065438, with the approval of the Supreme People's Court, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court executed the criminal Mo Huanjing according to law, and the procuratorate dispatched personnel to supervise on the spot according to law.