What are the similarities and differences between "Karma View" and "Fatalism" in Buddhism?

Karma and fatalism

Also based on the "law of cause and effect"

There are only two explanations of cause and effect

totally different

Based on fatalism

Is the separation of cause and effect.

Because the body is not a fruit body.

Fruit is not the reason.

There is no connection between the two.

however

The fruit is completely dominated by the subject.

Therefore, the "heterogeneous effect" has been produced.

other

Natane

The meaning of rule

There are many religions or beliefs in the world.

Including Christianity

Catholicism

* * * and so on.

Even astrology

Metaphysical palm

Tong Tong is a fatalist.

Although theologians love to say "free will"

however

The so-called free will

Can't hide his fatalism.

The causal law of fatalism: a reason

Make sure all the fruits.

(See the picture below) Picture reference:. Geocities/eeee 20065438+0/q110 (1) fatalism-the theory of puppet shows, which is the most extreme fatalism.

It is believed that human will chooses behavior.

This is all controlled by the owner.

Not from the self itself.

We are just a dominated puppet.

Faced with such a drama theory

We are not easy to refute.

at least

It is difficult for us to prove our ideas.

Direction and behavior

Out of self-reliance (will)

Or is it caused by other forces (domination)

For example, we have apples and bananas in front of us.

Someone likes it.

I chose bananas.

Extreme fatalists can say (by will)

Someone's preference is predestined.

So some people call it choice.

It is also out of fate.

So there is no will.

To refute these dramatic theories.

We can still establish a "holistic view" thinking.

(here.

I'm not going to refute these drama theories) (2) Fatalism-this kind of fatalism with low will.

Added personal will

Such a will

Does not help to deny fatalism.

There is a saying in metaphysics called "fate"

destiny

Destiny also

carrier

It's personal will

Old friends can only be transshipped

You can't change your life.

Man is bound by fate.

Is dominated.

Be at the mercy of fate

Theologians say: God gives people free will.

(euphemistically called freedom) However,

Man's will is also limited by the will of the personified God.

Because man's will is out of the personification of God's will.

Man is limited by God.

Is dominated.

Be at the mercy of fate

We call these wills low-level wills.

The fate conclusion of metaphysics

End with a theological god

The difference is that fate is not personified.

God

But instilled a personalized image.

Near ...

The law of its fatalism

ipentity

(See the picture below) Picture reference:. Geocities/eeee 20065438+0/q11/for extreme fatalists,

That kind of low-level will

It's just an excuse for human beings to comfort themselves spiritually.

Because fatalism and divine fatalism are "one cause"

Put away all the fruits. "

That so-called bottom will

But from its fruit

such

Said this kind of low-level will is considered as will.

This is a fallacy.

(See the picture below) Picture reference:. Geocities/eeeeeee2001/q112 The law of cause and effect established by Buddhists.

This is a neither-nor-two method.

Because the body is not a fruit body.

But never leave the fruiting body

Fruit is not the reason.

But don't stray from the subject.

The earthly fruits of past lives.

But this is the result of later generations.

therefore

The same thing

We can call it fruit.

It can also be called cause

For example, students make mistakes.

The teacher corrected him.

He will never make such a mistake again.

Students' mistakes are the reason.

The teacher corrected him.

The teacher corrected him.

He won't make any more mistakes.

The teacher corrected his view on this matter.

There are both causes and consequences.

It's also fruit.

The Law of Causality in the Concept of Causality: All Causes

Make sure all the fruits.

(See the picture below) Picture reference:. Geocities/eeee 20065438+0/q113 Strictly speaking,

There is no distinction between self-reliance and the other in Buddhism.

Independent person

Is self-centered

others

Be regarded as the master by the outside world.

Buddhism is not dominant.

Therefore, the ego is not absolute.

The so-called force

This is just the effect of self-harmony.

Separation force

Without self-reliance

Give up independence

Nobody else can find it.

of course

Buddhism does not deny human will.

however

This will is still limited.

restrain

Righteousness is "karma"

retribution for sin

Stay with your master.

What is the difference? host

He didn't dominate me.

I am the master of myself.

retribution for sin

He doesn't dominate me either.

I can't help myself.

Because of my past life.

It's not me in my life.

Therefore, I am not the master.

Because of my past life.

I'm not myself.

So it doesn't matter if he has the advantage.

Because there is no master

You can't define fate.

Extreme fatalist

Some people may question: since human will is limited,

Still limited by karma.

therefore

Karma should still be put in the principle of fate.

know

Karma is not qualitative.

infinite

Good deeds are innate.

What goes around comes around.

A person's first life is limited.

Have limited knowledge of things.

Therefore, it seems that karma is limited.

besides

Buddhists say: all living beings have Buddha nature.

Buddha nature

It's infinity.

Although all life is limited.

But its essence is infinite.

This is the so-called oneness and duality.

therefore

If you haven't stopped to practice through the ages.

Finally, we can learn from limited sex.

Become an infinite body

This statement is not from a to B.

(From finite to infinite)

But A itself has the duality of finiteness and infinity.

(From finite to infinite)

So finite and infinite are the unity of duality.

(See the picture below) Picture reference:. Geocities/eeeeeee 20065438+0/q114 2009-02-217: 49: 03 Supplement: The world always degenerates into fatalism.

Originated from people's own shortcomings.

For a period of time in life

The phenomenon of inequality

Including the poor and the rich.

Basic and expensive, etc

Empty one's mind

In order to fill this gap

Just destiny takes a hand.

Be the host

Destiny is inviolable.

Thereby producing a view of nature.

People should conform to nature.

Follow the laws of heaven

Or fate will never fail the world.

Smoothing the emptiness inside.

Or a creator

Examine the reality of the world

Be good at judging injustice in the world.

If it is.

The world is often bound by fatalism.

2009-02-2117: 49: 48 supplement: the concept of karma is not easy to awaken.

It also comes from human limitations.

People can only perceive the reality of a period of life.

For life and death

Without knowledge

therefore

For the so-called afterlife (or me in the afterlife)

It's hard to get emotional

Feelings don't matter.

2009-02-2121:18: 39 Supplement: There is another supplement: what goes around comes around is not qualitative.

Although it is my lifelong career.

However, what we have done in this life.

It will also affect the accumulated karma.

Buddhists call it giving.

therefore

What we are doing now is due to.

Karma change is the result.

Karma and the present

interact as both cause and effect

No one stipulates who.

2009-02-2121:43: 42 Supplement: This highlights the true value of "will".

2009-02-2121:44: 26 supplement: outstanding = particularly outstanding 2009-02-27 2 1:44:46 supplement: outstanding first.

I tried to tell the difference between dormitory theory and karma theory through an earlier article "Dressing as a cat". Dressed as a cat, I just watched a TV series.

One of the plots is that the hero teaches the heroine to "dress up as a cat."

I suddenly had an inspiration.

It's really diversified learning! "Playing the cat" is a very tasty thing.

How interesting! "Playing with cats" means sitting on the ground and starting with a price.

Or as the saying goes, "it's sold high." People are like this: in times of crisis and loss.

Only in this way can we know how to cherish and rejoice in the past. This is probably human nature! Why not grasp it when you have money?

Did you regret it when you were at the end of your rope? Don't invest in financial management if you have money.

Will only squander

You will regret it in the end. Why do you regret it? Because it's lost. But think about it.

Before you became rich, you never regretted not being rich.

Because you didn't. Then why do you regret it afterwards? Because you once owned it.

It hurts more when it's lost. Objectively speaking,

You have nothing to suffer.

But people are often emotional and subjective. When people fail,

More because of "loss" and sadness, regret.

They don't want to "start from scratch". Of course, I mean things that have no emotional foundation. Look at the emotional example again.

When a child leaves his parents.

I often regret that I am not filial enough and don't know how to cherish it. Why didn't you cherish it before Why not accompany them day and night? It is also because of loss. Someone has published the "theory" that "what should come will always come". I really beg to differ.

They may believe in fatalism. This is a physical problem involving relative time.

Did any prophet say that your relatives will leave tomorrow?

Is this inevitable? Even if it comes from a doctor, a scientist or a feng shui master.

Or "prophet"

There are still "eye contact" and "fate contact" practitioners.

This statement is not 100% correct. I believe some people have feelings and premonitions about the future.

But not necessarily accurate. Because the future is based on the present.

If you change now,

The future will naturally be different. Since the future is possible.

People think we should cherish it. But I think "cherish" is a function word and a pseudo word.

Does not mean that people who say "cherish" are hypocritical.

The word "cherish" I just said is not true. I said cherish.

Will it change? Never lose? What does it feel like to cherish? This is just a state of mind.

It doesn't really make sense. Instead of cherishing

It's better to catch it. Seize the opportunity

That is, "seize the opportunity." When you are rich.

Seize the opportunity to invest in financial management and what to buy.

Or save; When you are with the person you love.

Seize the opportunity to take care of them, communicate with them, associate with them and enjoy their love; When I'm with my lover

Seize the opportunity to make him/her happy, serve, cooperate and communicate; Learning time

Seize the opportunity to ask questions, understand and absorb knowledge. Possession time

We should seize the opportunity to cherish, play, enjoy and make use of it.

Try to maintain your relationship. The whole vast world.

Is fickle. Our future is based on the present.

Our present is based on the past. If you hadn't written a word less yesterday.

Or say one more word.

The situation may be completely different now. What we are doing now.

Will affect and change our future. So "fatalism" is incorrect.

Fate means that everything is predestined.

But the world is not destined to remain the same. 4/8/2008 2009-03-01:29:19 Supplement: The karmic theory of Buddhism is different from that of primitive India. In fact, people ignore the profound significance of karma in Buddhism. Because there is not necessarily karma. The key is whether there is karma nourished by good and evil, which is also the key to liberation. "The concept of karma is an inherent traditional thought in India before Buddhism appeared. This is a common means to persuade people to be kind. However, if you stay in the practice driven by the threat of karma, then you may not have a good grasp of the true meaning of Buddhism! (selected from: .myblog.yahoo/buddy * * *-ckw/article? Mid =10630-2009-03-0121:34: 24 Supplement: Therefore, the Buddhist theory of karma has added "origin", so karma is karma, and contemporary karma is karma. Whether the karma will be affected depends on whether the karma is enough ... "Simply put, what goes around comes around is your own behavior and your influence on yourself. From the law of karma, the traditional view of karma is reasonable and acceptable. However, the Buddha also pointed out the unique concept of "karma, but no author" from the principle of causality law, and expressed the view of karma different from traditional Buddhism. With people's actions (karma), they get corresponding retribution, which is generally familiar with the concept of karma. However, the karma is not so fixed, but changes with the subsequent karma. (selected from: .myblog.yahoo/buddy * * *-ckw/article? mid= 10646﹞

Reference: .myblog.yahoo/woodreus18/article? mid=66 1