AMD, on the other hand, pursues the game experience of mass players, so its cost performance is much higher than that of NVIDIA.
Nvidia has the advantages of low calorific value, good power control but too expensive, and its cost performance is not as good as AMD's.
AMD has a high cost performance, but its power consumption and calorific value are not as good as Nvidia's.
Compared with Intel and AMD, the difference is that
Intel is much better than AMD in performance. However, in terms of graphics cards, NVIDIA and AMD are on a par. It can be said that the wind and water have turned. NVIDIA has the upper hand for a while, and AMD has the upper hand for a while.
Mainly depends on the capital budget. If the budget is sufficient, you can choose Intel+Nvidia.
If the funds are average or insufficient, it will be much better to choose AMD with high cost performance.
If you plan to buy a graphics card, you might as well wait 1-2 months. In 20 14, NVIDIA will launch a new architecture to see if the cost performance of the new architecture can be restored. If the cost performance and advantages of the new architecture are not obvious, then consider other graphics cards.
Comparison between Intel and AMD:
/question/ 160395249 10 10838587 . html？ oldq= 1