In addition to shock, grief and reflection, the reactions from all sides are quite different. Exploring the construction quality, tracing the management responsibility, emphasizing the objective factors, praising the timely rescue of relevant parties, and endless good deeds, even geomantic numerology, also inadvertently spilled over. With the passage of time, the memory of the broken bridge event, like many other events, has gradually faded in people's memory, but people's views and conclusions on the event have never come together.
The only thing that can be called consistency is that everyone is actually thinking about the word "better late than never" and trying to learn from these two misfortunes to avoid similar problems in the future. However, it is true that great minds think alike, but there are different opinions on how to do it.
Some people have learned a lesson from the incident. Accidents are not terrible, but people's words are even more terrible. Without the input of public opinion and the participation of readers, although such an incident is a bad thing, it will lose a few money at most, so as not to discredit the local image. Therefore, what they make up is the mouth of the parties, the mouth of the onlookers and the mouth of the media. Although the central government has repeatedly emphasized and affirmed the role of public opinion supervision, in the eyes of some people, all this is far less important than their own position and local face.
The lesson some people get from the incident is that they should draw a "scientific conclusion" as soon as possible and make their responsibilities as clear as possible. So, under the eyes of the public, a safety appraisal of Jiujiang Bridge, which was hastily produced in only five days and proved that "the design and quality of the bridge are all right", suddenly appeared in front of people. As for why there is no problem with the bridge and whose bridge has problems, it seems that they don't care about identification. Originally, as long as the bridge was fine, some people naturally had no problem. As for who has a problem, what does it have to do with him? These people's "mending after the sheep is dead" is to mend their own flaws, so as not to toss themselves in under the pressure of the media, the persistent pursuit of the public and the investigation of relevant parties.
Of course, more people adopt another attitude of "mending after the sheep is dead".
For the frequent bridge accidents, they hate the "bean curd dregs project" and seriously reflect on whether the construction quality meets the design requirements; In view of the fact that the two bridges involved in the accident actually came from the same construction company, they questioned whether there was something fishy behind them, leaving more thoughts on how to ensure that the project bidding, project quality supervision and acceptance can really avoid black-box operation and truly achieve the survival of the fittest and quality first; They questioned whether the accident appraisal meeting held in a hurry after the accident was really enough to clarify the facts and distinguish the responsibilities, and began to look for accident appraisal procedures that met the requirements and norms, and actively promoted the establishment and improvement of similar procedures in various parts of China. For them, making up is a lesson, a loophole and a hidden danger, so there is no need to make up for it in the future.
199965438+1On October 4th, Chongqing Qijiang Rainbow Bridge collapsed. With the reprimand of the "bean curd residue project" and the determination to learn from it, the days passed day by day, but similar incidents did not stop. Fortunately, after the collapse of Jiujiang Bridge and the controversy caused by the subsequent accident identification, the relevant parties showed a more cautious, objective and scientific attitude when dealing with the accident of Fenghuang Tuojiang Bridge. It has been several months since the incident, and the accident appraisal conclusion has not yet been released. People breathed a sigh of relief while waiting anxiously. At least, this reflects the seriousness of the process, the prudence of the result, the science of appraisal attitude, and the real determination to "mend after it is too late".
It is too late to make up for it, but after every unfortunate accident, every party and relevant parties should seriously reflect and choose carefully.