The owners' committee is a mass autonomous organization that elects owners in residential quarters, and it is also a mass organization that owners are masters of their own affairs. Democracy should be the main body, not officials. Some people think that the owners' committee is a subsidiary body of power, so they talk condescendingly, lack democratic style and are arrogant, treating the owners of residential quarters as a group of tame sheep, and anyone dares to do it. Failure to serve the owners harms their interests, and often brings them to court, hurting their hearts and feelings. With the in-depth development of reform and the improvement of owners' awareness of rights protection, the era of "who dares to go up" is gone forever.
Pingluo Century Home Owners Committee is a fake election, which is an "election" under the control of property companies. Pingluo County Housing Property Registration and Management Office answered the article "unclear publicity", only answering superficial questions, but not substantive questions. Hiding the truth and not answering several questions raised by the owner. Just say that there are 20 buildings in Century Home, one building 1 person, and there are 20 people in the meeting, which is quite a lot. Excuse me: a building 1, 1 people attended the meeting, and ***20 people attended the meeting. Who appointed these 20 people? A clean hand wants no washing. Do you dare to publicize the list of 20 representatives of Century Home? Did they solicit the opinions of the owners they represented and truthfully reflect the written opinions signed by the owners themselves at the owners' meeting? .
You said Gong Yu Road Neighborhood Committee presided over the meeting. Since the Gong Yu Road Neighborhood Committee attended the meeting, why not leave the phone number of the neighborhood Committee and the phone number of the 6027 176 property management company? And "the staff of Gong Yu Road Neighborhood Committee, the publicity unit, couldn't tell how it was selected, but only publicized it according to the requirements of the property company". Can it be said that the neighborhood Committee participated in presiding over the meeting? 3. Why not inform all owners before the owners' meeting?
Look at "People's Republic of China (PRC) Property Management Law": Article 12 The meeting of the owners' congress can be in the form of collective discussion or written comments; However, there should be owners who hold more than 1/2 voting rights in the property management area to participate.
The owner may entrust an agent to attend the meeting of the owners' congress.
Members of the owners' committee shall be owners who are enthusiastic about public welfare undertakings, have a strong sense of responsibility and have certain organizational ability.
Article 14 A meeting of the owners' congress shall be held, and all owners shall be notified before the meeting 15.
See Article 10 of the Regulations of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region on Property Management. The owner of the house is the owner.
Twelfth all the owners in the property management area form the owners' meeting, and the owners' committee is elected as the executive body of the owners' meeting. A property management area establishes an owners' meeting. The owners' congress represents and safeguards the legitimate rights and interests of all owners in the property management activities within the property management area.
If there are a large number of owners in the property management area, owners' representatives may be elected to participate in the meeting of the owners' assembly in units of buildings. Before attending the meeting of the owners' congress, the owners' representatives shall solicit the opinions of the owners they represent in writing in advance, and truthfully reflect the written opinions signed by the owners themselves at the meeting of the owners' congress.
These regulations are well founded. Did you do it? Fake is fake, coming to power under the cover of legal mask, bullying the weak and fearing the hard. Pretending to be an official openly fooled the owners, obviously appointed by the property company, insisting that it was an election. Can you fool smart people? Is this your wisdom? Can this be considered learning besides showing off a little cleverness? You should understand fools, not wise men. If fools are regarded as knowledge, then no one in the countryside can understand the yin-yang teachers who jump into the gods, watch feng shui and tell fortune by reciting spells to ward off evil spirits. Their trick is to fool smart people in order to deceive people. Fake is always fake, really not.
2012 March 3 1 shepherd