There are so many problems, haha.
1. Do you believe in religion? If so, why do you believe in it? If not, why?
Answer: No. I have no reason to believe in a certain religion: first, I am not spiritually empty; second, there is no evidence to prove that what religion says is true. There are so many religions in the world, which one has proven itself? Third, I do not accept unfounded answers. I would rather remain in an unknown state than randomly find an answer to fool myself.
2. Do people need to believe in religion?
Answer: I do not deny or object to the need for some human beings to believe in religion. After all, people are different. If you don’t need it, others may not need it, but religious belief is not unique to all human beings. need. It is unreasonable to think that human beings can do whatever they want without faith.
3. What are your views on religious beliefs?
Answer: One person’s foolish belief is superstition, and a group of people’s foolish belief is religious belief.
4. What is your attitude towards religious belief?
Answer: To a certain extent, religion can maintain social order, rely on spiritual intimidation and deception to prevent people from breaking the rules, and play a role in uniting the spirit. However, from the perspective of human development, religion is rational. stumbling block, mental toxin, and the biggest mental obstacle to human progress. Overall, it does more harm than good.
5. Do you believe that there are ghosts in the world?
Answer: There is no basis for my belief.
6. Can religious beliefs defeat ghosts?
Answer: Because of the answer 5, this question is meaningless.
7. With the development of science and technology to this point, why do so many people still have religious beliefs?
Answer: There are many reasons: 1) Not everyone is rational enough, especially ordinary people, whose scientific thinking ability is not high. Even those who are college students can think rationally. few. Even among some people engaged in scientific work, there is still a lack of rationality deep in some consciousness. 2) In countries with strong religious traditions, religious education starts from childhood, and the subtle influence is too great. 3) Religion is a huge system of lies, which is accustomed to far-fetched information, lies and deception. To take the simplest example, when Einstein was alive, he publicly stated, "The statement that I believe in Christ is a lie" and "I do not believe in personal God." But now in the 21st century, Einstein Decades after his death, Christianity is still spreading the rumor that Einstein was a Christian. At the same time, the rumor that Darwin repented after his death is also spread over and over again. Even if it is revealed to be a lie, it will continue to spread in another place. People cannot be generalists who know everything. There are always some people who are deceived by organized religious lies in areas they are not familiar with. And once they are deceived, it is difficult to get out. After all, religion is organized. Yes, but anti-religious lies are unorganized.
But there is a very good development trend. In some countries with strong religious beliefs, although the proportion of believers is very high, the proportion of religious believers is declining year by year, and the proportion of believers is inversely proportional to scientific literacy. The higher the scientific level of the group, the lower the proportion of religious believers.
Many believers will say that 99% of scientists believe in religion, but this 99% includes ancient times, and many people who originally did not believe in religion, such as Einstein and Madame Curie, have also been misrepresented as religious. religious beliefs. There are many falsehoods in the content. As for the trends I mentioned above, they never dare to mention them.
It should be pointed out that in non-religious countries such as my country, the proportion of religious believers is increasing year by year, but the most accepting groups are still the vast rural areas and other culturally and economically underdeveloped areas.
8. If religious belief is a kind of spiritual sustenance, then do you need spiritual sustenance?
Answer: At least I don’t need the spiritual sustenance of religion.
9. How can we establish correct religious beliefs? 10. Are there right or wrong religious beliefs?
Answer: I will answer these two questions together. There is no right or wrong in religious belief. If you need it, it is the truth in your mind. If you don’t need it, it just doesn’t matter. It is itself a product of subjective conjecture, with no standards and possibilities for objective judgment.
But a religious person should at least know some basic ethics of respecting others. Unfortunately, religious groups are the group that least understands how to respect others, because one of the basic characteristics of religious believers is to believe that the religion they believe in is the absolute truth. On this basis, they can no longer accept other concepts. Be smart. Believers of non-religious systems, such as scientific achievements, will change their appearance and say that they have already existed in their own religion (this situation exists in large numbers in YSL, Buddhism, and Christianity), or that they are guided or inspired by the XXX of their own religion. Discovered, and then packaged in a mythical way, such as theistic evolution, for example. Some stupid people, such as fundamentalist believers, vigorously oppose modern science, such as directly opposing the theory of evolution and geology, and even go so far as to have an organization called the "Flat Earth Society" that firmly opposes modern science. The earth thinks that the earth is flat.
So, how to establish a correct religious belief is a simple yet difficult matter. It's as simple as just believing in it yourself and not preaching religion casually. But the difficulty lies in the fact that most religious believers have an extremely strong desire to preach.
================
There is a very deceptive logic in the reply of Datong Mountain King on the third floor, that is, "Look Just because it’s not available doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.” It should be said that there is no problem with this idea. However, this idea is the most deceptive one, because this sentence does not mention the other side, which is "In the absence of any evidence, if you say it exists, it must Does it exist?"
Religious believers can't provide their own evidence, so they say "just because you can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist." Without mentioning the other aspect I mentioned earlier, the subtext That is, "Although I have no evidence, what I said must exist." Many people are confused by this subtext.
In fact, in the absence of evidence, we do not know what exists, that is, "unknown". But religious believers must claim that they know this unknown (even if they do not say it is the truth, this conclusion will be implied).
There are many things that science cannot explain. Our conclusion should be unknown. If science wants to give an explanation, it must have a basis. But when religion gives an explanation, it never needs a basis.
When others question his argument, he will shirk responsibility by saying "What cannot be seen does not mean that it does not exist" (that is, the absence of evidence does not mean that it does not exist).
Religion uses lies to blind people's eyes, but it slanders science to blind people's eyes, which is a habit of confusing right and wrong.
This is the cunning thing about religion. No religion is immune to this.