Fishing in the no-fishing zone was inspected and claimed compensation of 270,000 yuan after escaping and falling. What was the final judgment of the court?

The court found that the reservoir should not be liable for compensation, and the judgment rejected the plaintiff's claim. Fishing in the forbidden fishing area was investigated, but after escaping and falling, he asked for 270,000 yuan compensation! It happened in the river area of a reservoir in Ziyang District, Yiyang City. This area belongs to the no-fishing area. Tu Hezhong sneaked here to fish one night, and when he was ready to pack up his fishing gear and leave, he found that the reservoir management patrol boat had sailed to the shore. Afraid of being punished, the two are ready to escape. However, Tu accidentally fell into a roadside pit during his escape, and another man asked the patrolman for help. Tu was rescued and sent to hospital for treatment. After identification, Tu was disabled by 10, and the medical expenses were 15400 yuan.

Tu sued the reservoir management office to the court, demanding that the reservoir compensate for its own medical expenses, disability compensation and other expenses totaling 270,400 yuan.

The court ruled that the plaintiff's claim was rejected and the reservoir was not liable for compensation. After accepting the case, the court held that the focus of the case was whether the reservoir staff had infringed Tu and whether the reservoir management office should bear the responsibility. After trial, the staff patrolling the reservoir at night persuaded the anglers to leave, which was a serious performance of management duties and should be supported and affirmed, and it was not illegal. Secondly, this area was originally a no-fishing area. It is not only illegal for Tu to fish privately in this sea area, but also against social morality. As a person with full capacity for civil conduct, Tu should bear the consequences of his escape after being discovered. Finally, the staff of the reservoir management office rescued after smearing the injury, which has fulfilled the obligation of reasonable rescue.

After a comprehensive trial, the court found that the Reservoir Management Office did not constitute an infringement of Tu and did not need to bear the liability for compensation in this case. According to the relevant provisions of the Civil Code, the court rejected the plaintiff's claim according to law, which means that the plaintiff has to bear all kinds of expenses and disability consequences.

This incident reminds everyone that not all injury claims will be supported by the court under any circumstances. In order to protect one's legitimate rights and interests through law in case of injury, one must live and entertain according to the rules and regulations in life, otherwise, one will only waste time and energy and cannot protect one's rights and interests through legal and reasonable channels.