The most curious thing about this kind of house is why it exists. As the demolition house that should have been leveled, the government and the demolition owner have their own words, among which the demolition owner said that the government's housing was not good, so there was no demolition. He also said that he didn't care about people's different views on him, just didn't want to disturb her life.
I thought, how is this possible? The existence of this house itself is very problematic, and the statement of the demolition owner is even more controversial. Is the housing provided by the government not good? How can two houses be inappropriate? I think some comments are right. The old lady didn't want one of the houses because it was facing the mortuary, but in the mortuary in the basement. How can you see it? As the government department responsible for the bridge construction, it did not come out to give a statement, which made us even more confused. Whose fault is the bridge under the bridge?
After all, this matter involves the use of public resources, and the bridge built with national resources will definitely cause economic losses and adverse social impacts for personal reasons. Of course, the matter has not been completely ascertained, and it is impossible to know who is right or wrong, but this matter has already caused social impact. From the incident to the present, the owner of the house has always said that he does not seek wealth and looks down on everything, but I don't know if this is the case.