On May 23, 2008, Yu published an article on his blog "Answering a reporter's question about Wenchuan disaster relief donation", explaining that "Professor Yu, as seen from newspapers and the Internet, your donation to Sichuan disaster area is as high as 200,000 yuan at a time". Many media widely reported that Yu "donated 200,000 yuan to the disaster area immediately after the Wenchuan earthquake, which became the highest donation record among scholars and writers in China". However, a year later, Xiao, an "old enemy" who fought an honorary lawsuit with Yu, published an article on his blog, "The Truth Investigation of the False Donation of Yu 200,000". The article was reprinted by many websites and forums in China, and pointed out that "the first anniversary of Wenchuan, the world's most shameless pop culture star and cultural businessman was the first humiliation of Wenchuan, and he jumped out to repeat his old tricks and made waves in the media." In addition to the amount of donations, many media reported last year that Yu led a nine-year-old scholar who promised to donate tens of thousands of yuan to the disaster area and help build two Hope primary schools during post-disaster reconstruction, which was also nicknamed commercial speculation. It's the first anniversary of the Wenchuan earthquake, and we haven't seen the news of the aid construction of the 99 Hope Primary School and the 99 Book Friends Hope Primary School ... We must finally confirm the donation (belonging to) a fictitious donation for the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake (the Hope Primary School promised by the company is also a fictitious Hope Primary School). Writer Zheng Hui responded with a donation certificate and a receipt of 380,000 yuan. In the face of doubt, I didn't take out a receipt to clarify the evidence, but I threw out four people, namely "Jade Biting Professional Household" and "Grain Rain Xiao Sha", saying that four people had been wasting their energy to spread rumors, and four people were also responsible for false donations, and hinted that they might be "exposed". Netizens have condemned this fraudulent donation behavior. Some Baidu netizens said, "I am in tears. My writing style is not as good as that of Cai Jing, Qin Gui and Guo Moruo, but my products are too good. The fake donation door became the rest of Waterloo, and it was ruined and deserved it. Although not necessarily accurate, it also reflects the attitude of a considerable number of netizens.
Criticism from other aspects: In fact, many people also criticized Yu's prose before Jin chewed up a lot of literary and historical mistakes. Gao Feng of Tianjin Normal University pointed out in the article "How many abrupt words" that Yu likes to use "warning words that look too abrupt" in his articles. The article "Wandering the Literary World with Cultural Lipstick" by Zhu of Tongji University points out that Yu's prose is light, frivolous, relaxed and frivolous, and he is a person who "travels around the world with cultural lipstick". However, this kind of innuendo itself is very "light", which is obviously different from Jin's criticism of fabricating facts and accusing plagiarism, and often cannot arouse the interest of non-literary and academic people.
The criticism of Yu focuses on: first, during the Cultural Revolution, he was a royal red man who killed people with a pen under the Gang of Four, and he had the bad behavior of royal literati! Second, the academic level is low, and people often make low-level academic, literary and historical mistakes, but they are praised as masters by the government (the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission personally awarded the title of Master Studio). Thirdly, prose has indeed created a new atmosphere, that is, the so-called "great prose", which is only touted by the media as a master of prose (more or less supported by the government) (in fact, it is just popular literature)! Fourth, the character is too bad, whether it is "tearful" or "fake donation", or reading his boastful articles, it is far from the image of a real scholar.
My tearful brothers and sisters
In classical Chinese, metaphor is equivalent to "I", metaphor with tears is equivalent to "I have tears", metaphor with X is equivalent to "I have X"
Now, the sister articles with "X" are listed as follows.
Milk powder says it contains melamine.
Duck egg theory-Sudan red and the rest.
Polk said.
Tell me about it-I have bacteria.
The pig said that the rest contained swine flu.
Lean meat theory-lean meat contains lean meat.
Fruit says-the rest contains pesticides.
Rice said-
The steamed stuffed bun said-
Cooking theory-pigs eat fat.
Seafood says-the rest contains formalin.
The furniture says the rest contains formaldehyde.
Spirits say-the rest contains methanol.