Yes, "idle door" has taboos, not "idle door" without taboos. What is a leisure door? That is, there are several doors in a room, and the dispensable door is the spare door. A room or a house has only one door in and out. Without such a door, there is no access, and the house becomes a dead end; With such a door, the house can be put into practical use, operable and movable; This kind of door is a "valve" under any circumstances, and the valve has no taboo under any circumstances.
Feng Shui does not advocate opening more doors. One room, one door is for life, many doors are for strangeness, and none is for death. I'm sure I can open more doors. I'm still alive.
The more doors you open at home, the better. Many doors are not rich and safe. If it helps, if necessary, be sure to open the door. If you don't open the door and have no passage, you will form a dead corner; Open the door to live, it is a valve, it is a road. Useless and redundant doors are empty doors, useless doors and evil doors. Use this view to check and measure every door in the home and block the redundant doors. Unnecessary and redundant doors, no matter how they conform to the laws of geomantic omen, will never be good. A useful and necessary door is a valve, which will never destroy geomantic omen.
For modern architecture, the following criteria are used to measure whether it is necessary or not. For example, the toilet is necessary and just right. If they are harmless, don't resolve them. What if there is no toilet? Another example is the door. If there is no door, it will form a dead corner. Just a door is a "door, a valve". Students are treasures, and there is no need to solve them. There is also a way to think and test the door. Whether transposition is more reasonable and practical, assuming that transposition is more inconvenient and unreasonable, then now is the best state and the most precious scheme, and it does not need to be solved. Another example is passages and roads. This is necessary, but not superfluous. If you don't spoil Feng Shui, there is no need to resolve it. Another example is the bathroom. Is it necessary and unique? Necessary, unique and useful are treasures, which need not be resolved. Needs and needs are wealth. Treasure, anywhere, misplaced, is still a treasure, can't be a disaster. Disaster is a disaster anywhere, and it cannot be turned into treasure.
In modern urban housing construction, all rooms have a door, which is a necessary door. Even if there is one more door, open it. Different from the architectural style of the old countryside, there is no problem that the door can't be facing the door. In an old-fashioned rural house, there are as many as 4-5 doors in one room. The doors are wide open, and the doors are facing each other, which is unsafe, inconvenient and warm. This is extremely undesirable, but there are various reasons for opening the doors, and there is no argument (I have encountered similar problems in repairing houses in the countryside, and I argued with my family and master for a few days, reducing six or seven doors, but still adding several doors. Therefore, in order to reduce the bad habit of opening more doors in rural areas, many problems have been raised.
Door to ladder. Right, right, wrong. That is, going up the ladder can be right, and going down the ladder had better be wrong.
A complete house, a door in and out of the room, no extra doors. The function, purpose, purpose and function of the door are very clear. In any case, they are valves, not unnecessary and useless deaths, but empty doors and abandoned doors. Under any circumstances, the valve does not violate the feng shui taboo. There is no such thing as a hall destroyer.
Neighbor's door is taboo, but our own door is not taboo. If a house has no door, it will "die" and form a dead corner. A door in a room may be "alive", and many doors in a room are "strange". The "death" door and the "strange" door are not opposite. The door of the room is opposite, and the distance of pedestrian activity route is shortened; The doors are not opposite, and the pedestrian movement distance is lengthened. Although it is only a small step or two, it is not a small sum day after day and year after year. It does not conform to the law of "from avenue to simplicity" in the Book of Changes. The highest rule of "from avenue to simplicity" is: all unnecessary ideas, ideas, objects and actions should be simplified; All unnecessary consumption and losses should be thrifty. These two steps, in the final analysis, are meaningless and unnecessary consumption of natural resources, which violates the common sense of heaven. The doors are not relatively staggered, and the room is invisibly cut into many triangular plates by the sight of pedestrians, which is inconvenient to store items and reduces the effective use area of the room; The doors are opposite, and the room is divided into square or rectangular plates by pedestrians' sight, which is convenient for the articles in the room and broadens the effective practical area of the room. Such a problem has long been uncontroversial among old carpenters; When my family was building a house in the country, the old carpenter opened all the doors in a relative position. Although the old carpenter couldn't tell the reason why he did this, he still spoke ill of himself on the grounds that he had the master's advice. But from the savage words of the old carpenter, we can realize that the ancients have long understood the scientific truth of the effective use of the area and width of the house. Why do people today move from a modern scientific society to a barbaric and ignorant society?
First of all, traditional architecture is based on the central symmetry theory. Modern architecture is mainly practical and functional. The two have different foundations. For example, the ancient geomantic omen theory developed on the basis of traditional ancient buildings, just like the ancient carriage driving technology, can be used to guide the driving of modern cars?
Second, ancient times were dominated by natural geomantic omen, while modern cities were dominated by artificial geomantic omen, and their foundations were completely different. How can we stick to the rules?
Third, in many places, houses could not be built for people to live in, and the basic living problems were solved when coal, gas, electricity and water were connected. In the past, wood, tiles and paper were the basic building materials, while modern steel bars, cement, glass and, worst of all, bricks are the basic building materials. Their ability to resist natural risks is obviously different. Ancient geomantic theory can't think of the factors and contents of modern scientific and technological progress. In a word, we should pay more attention to the power of science and technology.
About the door facing the balcony? -1. As long as it is not an idle and redundant door: without this door, it is a dead end, and you can't get in or out. Such a door is always a valve. There is no taboo in valve feng shui. 2. Balcony is an auxiliary facility of the house. In order to avoid violating the prohibition in some directions, Feng Shui sometimes deliberately adds auxiliary facilities in some directions to reduce the impact on the main facilities. The purpose is to ward off evil spirits. This is the meaning of the balcony. Auxiliary facilities will not affect the main facilities. Just like a banquet, how can you compete with others for wine without occupying a seat? No representative is qualified, so he is qualified to speak.
Can the living room balcony and corridor solid wall dissolve the door? The answer is: it has no practical significance except adding obstacles, troubles, normal activities, ventilation and sight.
The entrance door is facing bathroom door. Is tiger tail orchid suitable to be placed between two doors? -Some taboos of geomantic omen can stand scrutiny and are desirable, while others can't stand scrutiny and are not desirable. If the entrance door is facing the bathroom door, what's the use of putting tiger tail orchid in the middle? Doubt is an obstacle in the way, with the characteristics of stumbling block, which is not desirable in essence. The door can't be right, which is a manifestation of some schools' mystifying and endless troubles. The two opposite doors are straight lines, which have the characteristics of saving space and facilitating pedestrian activities. Why set up obstacles to stop people's activities? The two opposite doors are straight lines, which can save time and space for people to walk. It is not advisable to set obstacles in the middle, so pedestrians have to make a detour to expand the activity space, extend the activity route and increase the amount of exercise. It is not appropriate to learn the principle of "from avenue to simplicity". What is the avenue to Jane? The most direct and simple annotation and explanation is to save time, space and unnecessary consumption to the maximum extent. The two doors are opposite, with obstacles in the middle for pedestrians to bypass. Although there is only one or two steps to increase the activity, the cumulative calculation of pedestrian activities in one day, one year and a lifetime is not small, and the road is simple, that is, people's energy does not need to be wasted in such meaningless activities. If you are careless, inattentive and caught by this barrier in a panic, the loss or injury will be even more incalculable. The road is very simple, that is, there is no need to artificially create such troubles that harm others and harm themselves. From another point of view, in a certain space, as long as two doors are set, a visual straight line can be formed between them. If it is a straight line, there is a positive pair. Why can't it be straight? It's hard to understand that there must be obstacles in the middle!
Historically, we didn't go back indoors to avoid the door, only the skills and methods of opening the door were exquisite. Door can't be a new argument or theory invented by modern people.
At present, I still have an old house in my hometown, all facing each other, with several doors facing each other and the doors in symmetrical positions. When I was building the house, I suggested changing the position of the door from a convenient point of view. The old carpenter who built the house firmly opposed it, saying: he has a teacher's biography and is not responsible for anything. The old carpenter can't tell the reason from the reason. He is very stubborn, and he is arrogant because he won't let anyone change his position. The purport of The Old Carpenter's Biography: Its dominant position is the door position relative under the guidance of the central axis symmetry theory. I have repeatedly compared and thought about this problem in the future house use: if the door is not opposite, it is necessary to open the door diagonally or wrongly, so that a diagonal pedestrian route is formed in the middle of the house, the distance of the pedestrian route is lengthened, furniture items are not easy to place, and the effective use area of the room is obviously reduced. If the doors are opposite, the pedestrian route formed in the room is at the shortest straight distance on one side in one direction, which shortens the pedestrian route, facilitates the placement of furniture and obviously broadens the effective and practical area of the room. It turned out that the old carpenter's rude remarks about using teachers to bully people actually involved a university question-the effective practical area of the house and the length of the pedestrian route.