How convincing is it to know that Chen Anzhi didn't succeed before conducting successful research? I think this just creates a castle in the air system.

His success is a successful promotion of successful learning.

Napoleon Hill, the founder of Success Studies, was poor before he founded Success Studies. He didn't achieve anything. Only after he founded the science of success did he become famous. Anthony robbins, the world's number one motivator, didn't succeed until he publicized his success. It can be seen that a successful lecturer is not necessarily a successful person before becoming a lecturer. As long as the scope of successful learning can be expanded, the more people know and learn, the more successful he will be.

Chen Anzhi reads hundreds of books every year, including all kinds of books, such as news, entertainment, economic magazines, gossip, biographies of Feng Shui characters and so on. He said it himself. The way he reads is not to read every book from beginning to end, but only to pick up new content and read valuable content, and filter out all meaningless knowledge or knowledge that has appeared in other books he has read before to save time.

The content of success science is to guide people to take measures and methods to make themselves successful. In fact, the content of successful learning has its shadow in our ordinary books and even primary school textbooks, but it is rather chaotic. As a science, the essence of success is to integrate these scattered ideas in books like this to form a system. For example, when we were in the first grade of primary school, did the teacher teach us to work harder than others if we want to succeed? This is also the concept of success. Therefore, the idea of success is to systematize some ideas or famous sayings that can make people grow faster and benefit one's success.

Of course, not everyone agrees with the idea of success, but many people are against it, including Zhang Jingui, one of the four famous speakers in Taiwan Province Province and one of the eight lecturers in Asia. Everyone has his own understanding of success. After all, it's hard for everyone to get in. If you think he is good, you should learn from him. If he is not good, you can ignore him. For example, if you want to succeed, you must keep learning. Can you deny this view? I can't. For another example, if you want to succeed, go crazy first and keep your mind simple. I'm afraid many people are against this view. So I personally think that success is a set of ideas that can inspire people's fighting spirit and passion. It can't make you succeed by itself, but only stimulate your desire for dreams. Only by real efforts and pursuit can we really succeed, not by learning.

I hope my point of view can help you!