Is Lianshan back to Tibet lost or was it originally a fake?

First, the origin of the name of Lianshan Yi was called Lianshan in ancient times. Its name was first seen in Zhou Liguan Chunzong's Boda Supplement: "(Dabu) The method of palm three changes: one is Lianshan, the other is returning to Tibet, and the third is Zhouyi. Its classics are all eight, and the rest are sixty-four. " His book "Guiren" says: "Guiren holds three changes to distinguish the names of nine books: one is Lianshan, the other is Guizang, and the third is Zhouyi." In the previous books, there are no names about these two ancient books. Unfortunately, the book Zhou Li has long been proved by academic circles to be a fake by Liu Xin in the Han Dynasty. It is made by taking old books and participating in your own thoughts. Although some primitive ancient materials are indeed used, their fictional elements also account for a large proportion, and many contents are not reliable. Among them, the names Lianshan and Guizang were invented by him, and his forgery was based on Shan Hai Jing. On this issue, the author has clearly identified it in the article "The Origin of the Names of Lianshan and Guizang" [1], so I might as well briefly explain my views here. The Book of Changes was originally used by the ancients as a reference for divination. There was more than one kind in ancient times, just look at Zuo Zhuan. Qin fire didn't burn the book of divination, so in the Han dynasty, it will naturally be handed down a lot, Zhouyi is one of them, and there are some others, but not very significant. Liu Xin once led the school secretary. He must have discovered this, so when he was writing Zhou Li, he decided to write two kinds of ancient changes besides Zhouyi to make up for the number of "three changes". At the same time, he also found that some contents of these ancient Yi books are closely related to the contents of Shan Hai Jing, which can be understood from Guo Pu's reference to Gui Zang (this book was an ancient Yi in the Warring States Period, and was originally named Fei Gui Zang in the Jin Dynasty). Therefore, Liu Xin invented two ancient names according to Shan Hai Jing and Yi Li. The Classic of Mountains and Seas consists of five Tibetan mountain views and the Classic of Seas, among which the five Tibetan mountain views are a part, referred to as mountain views for short. Haijing is as famous as four foreign books and four domestic books, among which four foreign books are also called Yejing. Let's take a look at the book Mountain Classics. It is true that one mountain is connected with another, and the mountains are continuing. It is a veritable book of Lianshan, so the title of Lianshan was drawn up accordingly. According to The Sea Classic and The Huang Da Classic, the author draws up a name of ghost hiding, that is, the sea belongs to water, which belongs to the divination in Zhouyi, and the divination in Shuogua says: "The divination means water. ..... everything belongs to ",and took a word" return "from it; Wild land belongs to Kun Gua in Zhouyi, which says: "If you go with your ruler, Kun will hide", hence the word "hide" and the name "return to Tibet" came into being. So the name "Lianshan", like "Ghost Hide", is actually forged by Liu Xin, which is not credible. It is precisely because its name came out late, and the books that came out late were mixed with authenticity, so the lawsuits against Lianshan by scholars in past dynasties have different opinions, whether they believe or not, and there is no conclusion (refer to the series of Lianshan Attached to the book Fang Shan Collection attached to this article).