Dialectical logic of yin and yang
Dialectical logic of yin and yang is an organic combination of "dialectics of yin and yang" and "dialectical logic" because its content and form perfectly unify the two. What is the nature of this philosophy? "Yin and Yang" is its self-nature, which belongs neither to idealist dialectics nor materialist dialectics. Idealist dialectics holds that consciousness is the origin of the world, material comes from consciousness, and consciousness is absolutely ahead; Materialist dialectics holds that matter is the origin of the world, consciousness is the product of matter, and matter is absolutely ahead.
So, who is higher in "Dialectics of Yin and Yang" or "Dialectics of Yin and Yang Logic"?
Of course, "the logic of yin-yang syndrome differentiation" is a higher level than "yin-yang dialectics"
Then, what is the relationship between "dialectics of Yin and Yang" and "dialectics of idealism" and "dialectics of materialism"?
Dialectics of Yin and Yang is the sublation and sublimation of idealist dialectics and materialist dialectics.
So, "dialectics of Yin and Yang" is higher than "materialist dialectics"?
Here's the thing.
What proof do you use? How to convince me?
I can prove it by logical methods and historical events.
Prove logically first,
Dialectics is to think about the problem from two opposing aspects that constitute the contradiction of things, and to find the correct answer from two coordinates and two starting points.
Both idealism and materialism adhere to a position and a foothold, and think from a coordinate and a starting point, which is a linear thinking mode. So it's easy to be paranoid and go to extremes. Adhere to one aspect of contradiction, deny, refuse and exclude the other. Thinking about problems is one-sided, and dealing with problems is easy to be emotional, unreasonable, unfair and unjust.
Materialist dialectics itself cannot avoid the above problems. Why?
Because "materialism" is the attribute and major premise, and it controls "position" and "world view" on the "throne".
Dialectics, on the other hand, only cares about methodology, is in the position of "assistant" and is a dominated servant. The courtiers have no ability to restrain the monarch.
This is why, in the history of the international capitalist movement, even devout followers of Marxism often have very different views on the same state of affairs, resulting in differences between "idealism and materialism" and the so-called "left-leaning line" and "right-leaning line" struggle. China had a 10 line struggle, the Soviet Union had many times, and there were several times in the first and second international periods.
Dialectics of Yin and Yang is the dialectics of philosophy of Yin and Yang, and "Yin and Yang" as an attribute is the major premise, which dominates "standpoint" and "world outlook".
The concept of "Yin and Yang" itself represents two contradictory aspects of things, so the world outlook and methodology are completely unified.
"Yin-Yang Theory" is to observe and think about problems from two positions, two coordinates, two footholds and two starting points, that is, the consistency of "empathy" and "the mean". It is a double helix thinking mode, which has the functions of self-checking, error correction, finding and choosing the best scheme. Therefore, it is not easy to be paranoid and go to extremes. We will not stick to one aspect of contradiction and deny, exclude or exclude the other. Avoid one-sidedness of thinking, and it will be easy to deal with problems reasonably and fairly.
In addition to the above reasons, there is another important reason why "dialectics of yin and yang" replaces "materialist dialectics", that is, the progress of science and technology proves that "thought, consciousness and spirit" are special forms of energy, and energy is a special manifestation of matter. Energy and matter are different manifestations of the same objective existence and can be transformed into each other under certain conditions.
Therefore, the new epistemology completely unifies "idealism" and "materialism", and their thousands of years of pen and ink lawsuits have ended here, and it is lagging behind science to continue to call "materialist dialectics".
Transforming "materialist dialectics" into "yin-yang dialectics" not only makes Marxist philosophy China, but also makes Marxist philosophy complete the complete nirvana of merit and sublimate to a new philosophical realm on a new historical platform. In this realm, there will be no imprisonment, no frame, no more "online" labels and sticks. In an infinite world, people can.
Below, use historical events to prove it.
Let's talk about the Roman historical story of this bitter rival first!
From the beginning of social labor, human beings on the earth bid farewell to the lifestyle of lower animals. The relationship between man and nature has become the relationship between theme and object, and the process of understanding the object by theme has begun. This process is difficult and long, from dribs and drabs to accumulating experience, from low level to high level, from superficial to profound,,,,, people find that the world is big and everything is born and died endlessly. Man knows things from the simplest labor.
Human social labor is organized cooperative labor, which requires people involved in cooperation to cooperate with each other and act in unison. To act in concert, we must have the same understanding and ideas, and someone must act as an organizer to unify everyone's ideological understanding. Everyone is still confused. How can we unify them? The first thing that comes to mind is "divination". Decide to act or not to act by agreeing on the appearance or non-appearance of a phenomenon. Through the understanding and speculation of divination results, we think that uncontrollable natural forces are "mysterious forces-ghosts and gods" other than human beings, so there is fear of ghosts and worship of gods, which is the earliest "primitive religion" created by our ancestors, and idealism is born.
The frequent divination activities of ancestors produced the wizard who presided over the artifact-the earliest cultural person of mankind. Wizards gradually become spiritual leaders and tribal leaders. Tribal leaders gradually formed the highest authority. Once authority is formed, it becomes an irresistible and insurmountable control force above the people's supremacy and the opposite of people's freedom. With the improvement of productivity, the surplus of material resources and the formation of private ideas, the hereditary system of private possession of ruling power naturally arises. Humans entered the slave society from the primitive commune of freedom and equality, and civilization and barbarism began at the same time. The rulers combined the primitive theocracy with the kingship of the country, creating a compound monster of "kingship endowed by God" and creating the dignity of kingship decorated by theocracy. The primitive religion of the ancestors developed into a "mandate of heaven" with complete theory, which strengthened the people's awe and worship of theocracy and kingship. Since the development of idealism, the spiritual bondage of the people has been strengthened. After the disintegration of slave society, the concept of "divine right of kingship" was inherited and continued to be the spiritual tool of feudal social rule.
With the help of theocracy, kingship brutally oppressed the people without fear, imposed unbearable pain on the people, became a sober agent, forced people to compare and think about their own life experiences, doubted and denied the theory of "divine right of kingship", and led to a peasant uprising that criticized theocracy for resisting oppression and overthrowing kingship. Because the liberation of this spirit comes from the practical experience of productive labor and class struggle, and from the understanding of the changes and movements of the material world and human society, materialism as the natural enemy of idealism has emerged.
Since then, idealism and materialism have struggled with each other and denied each other for thousands of years.
The continuation of social practice and the progress of human society constantly test and confirm the advantages and disadvantages of idealism and materialism. Experience tells people that idealism is not entirely wrong, but also has reasonable elements; Materialism is not all truth, but also has great limitations. Until the18th century, two great philosophers appeared in Germany, Marx and Engels, who systematically cleaned up the history of human philosophy. Engels wrote Feuerbach and the End of German Classical Philosophy, which made a profound analysis and comparison between Hegel's idealistic philosophy system and Feuerbach's materialistic philosophy system, and concluded that Hegel's whole logic system was inverted and idealistic in the subjective and objective world, so it was incorrect. But the method he used is dialectical, witty and flexible. Feuerbach's philosophical system is materialistic and correct, but his thinking method is mechanically rigid and poor in theory. Therefore, we adopted the materialist philosophy system and the dialectical method of idealism, and founded materialist dialectics. Thus, the first historical integration of idealism and materialism was completed. The formation of materialist dialectics has made a great leap in human cognitive ability. Together with the Manifesto of the Productive Party, it has strong critical power, making it a theoretical weapon for all oppressed classes, oppressed people and oppressed nations to resist and seek liberation. This philosophical theory has become a banner calling for proletarian awakening and United struggle. The pent-up public anger it aroused pushed the whole old world into the revolutionary era of fire and blood in 19 and the 20th century, and for the first time on earth, socialist Soviet Union, socialist China and Oriental Group composed of more than ten socialist countries were successively produced.
The revolutionary theory founded by Marxist philosophy launched the international proletarian movement. Leaders of production parties in various countries apply this truth in the new revolutionary practice, while continuing to develop, enrich and test this truth. While we won great victories, we also encountered insurmountable obstacles on our way forward, made serious mistakes and left a painful historical lesson.