No matter in study, work or life, everyone is familiar with composition. Composition is a narrative method to express a theme through words. You always have no way to write a composition? The following are six 600-word debate compositions I compiled for you, for reference only. Let's have a look.
Debate composition 600 words 1 This afternoon, the teacher organized us to divide into those in favor: opening books is beneficial, while those against it: opening books is not necessarily beneficial, and a debate was held. I choose the opposite side.
The bell rang for class. The teacher asked us to sit face to face with the opposition and the square. "Small eyes stare at small eyes." The classroom immediately filled with a thick murderous look. Everyone suddenly became nervous, and the teacher was no exception. It was a tit-for-tat game!
The bell rang again, and the teacher gave an order: "Go!" The king in the square was the first to raise his hand high. "You tell me!" The teacher's name is Wang "Hello everyone! I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books. Because. . . . . . "I didn't hear anything he said later. I'm just thinking about how to say it! "Good-very good-that's it!" I muttered to myself. I want to talk about choosing books.
"So I choose to open the book!" Seeing this, the king also sat down. The teacher nodded and gave him a point. "Teacher, I want to refute him!" I raised my hand. I don't know if it's because I was moved by my own spirit, or I think it's time for the other party to talk. She told me to get up. "Come on!" Yu Hongjing next to me gave encouragement, and I stood up confidently. "Hello everyone! I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books, because we don't know which books are good and which are not-"Jia will refute me before I finish. ""teacher, I want to refute! " He said, "Go!" The teacher added a little to me as he spoke.
"The ancients said,' There is a golden house in the book'." As long as you read books, you can gain something. "He said, but I immediately refuted him. He was speechless. When Zhou Jintai saw it, he immediately stepped forward to help. I wanted to say more, but the teacher had already given them some. I sighed deeply and sat down. Alas! The foam that just flew out is in vain.
This war of words is getting more and more fierce. All the students in our team came to help me. But they are also very competitive, not to be outdone, they are better. At this time, the game is over. We lost because there were too many people. But as we all know, winning or losing is a common occurrence for military strategists. We all know that whether we win or lose, we are all friends!
In this way, today's debate ended in the applause we gave ourselves.
Today, Grandpa Sun smiled very sweetly, and the long-awaited debate finally came to an end. I'm sure. We started a competitive debate on the topic "Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?".
At the beginning of the debate, the two sides argued endlessly and expressed their opinions. I smelled a strong smell of gunpowder from the beginning of the battle; Then there is one-on-one confrontation and debate. In the first round, we spoke plausibly, and so did the opposing side. The two sides are evenly matched. In the second round, I elaborated forcefully, leaving the other side speechless. Even the other side argued: "I am afraid of opponents like God, but I am afraid of teammates like pigs!" " "After the war of words between the two sides, this round of fighting is over.
Then there is my favorite free debate. Answer first, and the other party confidently said the disadvantages of turning on the air conditioner. Not to be outdone, we gave the other side a head-on blow, and the other side argued and argued irrationally. At this time we had a conflict, that is, everyone wanted to answer, and we all stood up at the same time. I just said, but my teammates stood up, too. I hesitated several times and had to press my teammate mercilessly, I said plausibly. After several rounds, the opposing sides never spoke, and finally spoke. When we argued, we hit back at each other with golden words. After a fierce battle, we were slightly better than others in number (in fact, the number was the same, but the other two debates, like an innocent person, were half done without saying much! ") The opposing side was prepared to turn the tide in the audience's questioning, and sure enough, the opposing audience, Mr. Ye, gushed, and our leaves did not flinch, just as Mr. Ye said. Finally, the two sides ended the debate, and the host Lele announced the end of the debate and invited the referee to take the stage. The noun came out, win-win. Everyone is very happy.
On the way home, listening to birds singing and watching the sun smile, I feel particularly comfortable. In fact, natural air is still good!
Time flies, the sun and the moon fly, and in a blink of an eye, six years of primary school life has come to an end. My dream is to have another debate contest before graduation, so that my eloquence can show my talents again. The study of Unit 5 gave me such a platform.
The argument of this debate is "Is the development of science and technology more beneficial or harmful?" As I have a say in our group, I choose to benefit from it without hesitation. As we all know, without the development of science and technology, how can we live a happy and beautiful life today? As the leader of the square, I led our team members to brainstorm, and Qi Xin worked together to actively prepare for the war. Finally, we not only found a lot of information on the internet and books, but also created the slogan of our group, "Science and technology develop well and human progress is great."
In the afternoon, this exciting debate finally kicked off. At first, the morale of both sides was unexpectedly high, neck and neck. First of all, I speak on behalf of the positive side. I was full of confidence, and I walked onto the platform with great pride and asked the other debater a red face. Finally, I got thunderous applause from my classmates, and Miss Li's approving eyes and full marks were ten.
Feng Xiaolin's performance made me even more dumbfounded. She is the representative of Chinese class in our class and a very quiet girl. The teacher always says that she doesn't have the demeanor of a Chinese class representative, but today it seems that I am really ignorant! I saw that she quickly stepped onto the podium, and a series of questions made the other debater speechless. Seeing this, our debaters couldn't help laughing.
We had a smooth journey, strategizing and winning, but something unexpected happened. Zhan Qingwen's speech made us lose the battle. She proudly walked onto the podium and said all the words I just said. Some students were impatient and said rudely, "Don't talk when you're finished!" Finally, we sadly got a zero duck egg.
The wind and water have turned, and we have lost. Although I lost, I also learned a lot of knowledge and got exercise in this debate. Failure is the mother of success. I will definitely learn from this failure and make myself more perfect.
Debate composition 600 words 4 A special debate is about to begin.
The theme of our debate is: opening books is beneficial, but not necessarily beneficial. Zheng Fang Xiao Yang first spoke: "Reading can increase our knowledge, enrich our after-school life and broaden our horizons, so it is beneficial to open books." Xiao Yang's words won thunderous applause and cheers from the students, and won the first prize for the students who supported "opening books is beneficial". Opponent Xiao Zhang stamped his foot and said unconvinced, "Opening a book may not be beneficial. If we read unhealthy books, we may go astray! " Fang Ling suddenly stood up and said softly, "But we didn't read those unhealthy books." This sounds irrelevant to the debate, causing the students to burst into laughter, but it eased the gunpowder smell of the debate a little. In the laughter, Xiao Yang stood up again in a hurry, his eyes wide open, his hands crossed at his waist, and he murmured, "Yes, as long as we read those good books, we can achieve' opening books is beneficial'." One by one, the eyes of approval once again gathered on Xiao Yang. "What we are saying is that opening books may not be beneficial." Xiaohong said: "It doesn't necessarily mean that there must be no, but there may or may not be. Therefore, it is right that opening a book may not be beneficial. " Xiao Hong, the opponent, saw that the other side was aggressive and quickly explained.
Although after a burst of angry words, the pros and cons still didn't win the battle, but I think as long as I read useful books, I will gain knowledge and be a "full of poetry" person.
Teacher's words:
Colorful campus, there are many things that are the source of our composition. A thematic debate about "opening a book is beneficial" and "opening a book is not necessarily beneficial" was vividly described by Lin Juncheng, a young author, because the young author closely followed the characteristics of the debate, enriched the language and movements of the characters, and vividly presented this controversial debate to us. For example, Zhang stamped his foot and said unconvinced, "Opening books may not be beneficial. If we read unhealthy books, we may go astray! " For another example, Xiao Yang stood up in a hurry, his eyes wide open, his hands crossed at his waist, and he was eloquent: "Yes, as long as we read those good books, we can achieve' opening books is beneficial'." The ending is forceful, which not only summarizes the full text, but also points out the main idea of the debate, arousing readers' * * *. The full-text narration is natural and vivid, and the structure is compact, which reflects the young author's ability to control the language and deserves praise!
Debate essay 600 words 5 "Bell ... Bell ...", "Here we are, so nervous." There was a loud noise in the classroom. Which class is it? Yes, that's from our Class Five (1).
Today, we will hold a debate. The topic is: there is truth everywhere in the world. The topic of the opposing side is: human feelings are as thin as paper. I stand on the positive side. Although all our students are excellent students, none of them are imposing, which makes our hearts more uneasy.
In the first round, the main debater spoke. The teacher asked us to choose three debaters from both sides, and none of us would go on, pushing and shoving, "Come on! Hurry up, don't delay, or we will lose. " No one wants to be a debater. We are anxious like ants on hot bricks. At this moment, we saw a man who is not fat and short on the stage. After a closer look, it turned out to be our classmate in the square. She was the bravest one in our square. Then, Wu Zongjin and Zhou Maoyuan followed closely. Before we stepped onto the stage, the other party was already waiting on the stage. Teacher Ye scolded us. We didn't speak, just hung our heads.
The first round was against Zhou Maoyuan, the second round was against Liang, and the third round was against Yao Shilin by Wu Zongjin. Both sides spoke very well, so it was a draw.
The second round is free debate. Our classmate Chen Shuyang said: "If human feelings are as thin as paper, is your parents' love for you also false?" "Ha ha, this stumped you, but rival Lin Ruohan said," I don't know how many people died in America in one minute. Is this the best truth in the world? "Neither of us let go, but fewer and fewer people raised their hands, and finally we lost.
We lost the debate, and we were so sad that we almost cried. We kept blaming ourselves: "why didn't I raise my hand earlier and wait until the end?" If I had raised my hand earlier, we might have won. " If I can turn back the clock, I will hold my hand high so that we can win.
Debate composition 600 words 6 "All right, let's do it! Hahaha ... see how they refute! " With the end of the group discussion, the debate about "can primary school students get paid for housework?" Yes, we are positive!
My voice just fell when I put forward the idea that I could get paid. I saw Fang Moumou, the other player, and immediately opened my mouth and said a lot, but I can't remember it anyway. The two sides were silent for a while, and our Xu said unhurriedly, "Paying the child can motivate him and make him interested in housework."
"This will make children dependent on money!" The other side refused to give in.
The debate became so fierce here that both sides seemed unable to let go of their faces and began to refute constantly, making the other side feel that they were going to quarrel. Some students blushed and looked very excited; Some students are even more salivating and want to make the other party speechless directly.
Seeing that the momentum of the other side overwhelmed us, I had to release the "killer": "The other side said not to always think about the return, but the society now is very realistic. You can't live without giving. Do you want this? " Later, the teacher pointed out that this view is good and has risen to the height of the social environment. Keep your tune high, as long as you can save your teammates.
Several rounds of war of words, time flies. Finally, when the other party put forward an idea, our music classmates wanted to answer, so we gave him a chance. But the farther he talked, the more he faltered.
The teacher summed up the wonderful arguments of the debate and put forward a new point of view: the reward for doing housework is only a few dollars symbolic, so the incentive significance is greater than the reward significance. Huh? Why didn't I think of that?
The more the truth is argued, the clearer it becomes. After this debate, I have learned a lot: housework is the obligation of every family member, but it is positive to motivate lazy children with appropriate remuneration. Looking forward to the next debate!
;