Who is better at swallowing elephants, Li Hongcheng or Takashima?

Takashima is a recognized Yi-ology scholar, but he is not as good as the sages of China. Because he simplified the divination method in the Book of Changes, no matter which divination is a trick, it is easy to break the divination and it will come true. But there is less content in this way. That is, 64 hexagrams multiplied by 6 equals 384 changes, and each hexagram is just a movement, so a hexagram can only be changed into 6 hexagrams. However, the ancient sages of our country moved a hexagram at will, so a hexagram can be changed to sixty-four, and sixty-four hexagrams multiplied by sixty-four changes is 4096 changes. Everything in the world has to be done. It is undeniable that Takashima's method can also deal with everything. But China's ancient method is more advanced than him, and his progress is both progress and degradation. Li Hongcheng is the prediction of six hexagrams, and a group of eight characters will meet again. Like me, can he be called a Yi-ology scholar? Some people say that Fang Jing is also a divination. Can we compare Fang Jing? Fang Jing is the inventor of Liuyi. Not all Fang Jing's inventions have been handed down. This is a distressing thing. Modern Yi-ology workers are all interpreting ancient works, not Yi-ology scholars. If they can approve eight characters and calculate divination, they will be Yi-ology scholars.