I saw the premiere at that time. I waited for this movie for six years. When entering the cinema, the whole scene was as boiling as World of Warcraft at the same time, but worse than the scene of Rogue 2. . . . Thief 2 is a junior high school girl. . . Shouting at the screen all the time is so handsome. . .
My feeling is the theme, publicity, production, music and design of this film. They are all excellent. Many rare beasts recorded in Shan Hai Jing added to the plot, which also strengthened the fullness of the world view. And most importantly, the domestic dubbing that has been criticized is no longer a problem. The actors gave excellent performances, especially the voice of Lingpo.
The above is my comment on the excellence of big fish. Then I said some bad things, which led to problems through my interaction with the audience in the cinema. There are many interactions between big fish, but most of them are not benign. Except for a bridge festival, the audience even cried. But other places of interaction have been seriously hurt. For example, at the beginning of the film, when the older Thun narrated the preface, the audience laughed ... when he came out, he was pulled by a piece of shit ... The audience sent a fascinating line, "Whose love do you think you accepted?" This is God's love. "The audience sent out, huh? After the response, on the way back to the sea, the conversation between the two also caused embarrassment in the whole process. Not cold. Oh, then go to sleep ",especially that sentence, you treat me like a brother, even in addition to laughter, many people in the audience spit out the" good man card ". Of course, the role of the mouse girl halfway also has a "musical" atmosphere.
This just shows that the biggest problem of this film is the director's control over the plot of this film.
To tell the truth, most people who came to see this film originally came with an appreciation attitude. Basically, they think that "Big Fish" should be a literary film, and it seems that it is indeed a literary film in propaganda. However, the sudden sex, horse manure and embarrassing dialogue between Toona sinensis and Qiu undoubtedly did not play a good role. It may be that the director thinks the film has some humorous elements, but he makes these points of the film very embarrassing. . . That's right. . . This movie is always on when you watch it. This shows that there are problems in the application of script skills.
Moreover, in the opening remarks, there were lines about sex, which made everyone feel embarrassed. In order to avoid embarrassment, they adjusted their mood to a very formal angle, and then soon the horse manure bridge seemed to be blown, which was not so formal. Finally, the plot unfolded a little, and the atmosphere of the middle line was gone. . . Because the audience had doubts, watching the plot become more and more fluent, just at the most fluent time, a musical sentence of Rat Girl was played again. . . I don't take the stalk behind me. In short, this film is very unpleasant to watch. This is the biggest harm. Whenever people are brewing emotions, the style of painting will change suddenly.
Perhaps the director was too eager to express himself in the public opinion of 12 years, trying to integrate too many elements, too young and too hasty, which caused an irreparable sense of disobedience. The offensive point is that the director has a big appetite and wants to play everything. As a result, when he mentioned a good story, it turned sour.
It feels like a trip. If you put down your material needs, travel lightly and pay attention to the enjoyment of the journey, then the trip will be very romantic. But if you care too much, you have to bring several sets of clothes to eat and a quilt to warm yourself up. If you are dirty, you must take some books. What should I do if I'm bored? Take an umbrella in case it rains. ...
If the director takes a good literary route and abandons what he wants to express, then this film may really become a masterpiece.
The above is my personal opinion.
However, it is said that this film is not good and has a long history ... Before it was released, some people said that the big fish Haitang was bragging ... It must be spicy chicken ... Immediately after it was released, some people reacted that the plot was too bad, the lines were too bad, the dubbing was too bad, and the people were too bad. Why is Miyazaki Hayao's shadow? This stupid thing is also called animation, animation, animation, and so on? Then all kinds of blowbacks came out. Let's just say that different people have different opinions.
People who comment like this do not come with a discussion attitude, nor do they accept the advantages and disadvantages of movies with an open mind. They didn't even go to the movies with the attitude of going to the movies. It was only because I posted the war for several years that I found the part in the movie that I was right. I didn't look back at the work itself.
When we go to see the film, we should put aside all other ideas. Too many people take other works with them when watching this movie, and there will definitely be similarities when watching it. There are also too many people who think about the domestic animation environment while watching this movie, and then give this movie a masterpiece.
This is a very interesting philosophical question, just like a window, which is either closed or open. When the window sash is in the half-open position, you can say that its state is half-open or half-closed. The result is, of course, that the one who is pushed away thinks it is half open and the one who is pulled back thinks it is half closed. The variable is not this window, but people's thoughts. Let's discuss the result. People are discussing their views, but they forget that this window is there.
As for the name of Haitang, it should be Haitang. The big fish refers to Kun in the film, and the begonia flower in the film is the symbol of the heroine Toona sinensis, which also shows that this is a story around Kun and Toona sinensis. Of course, this is just my personal opinion.