First of all, explain this problem with objective data, and don't easily resign from central enterprises (including high-quality state-owned enterprises).
According to the statistics of employment intention of graduates this year, central enterprises rank first (with high comprehensive income), well-known foreign-funded enterprises in Europe and America rank second (with high annual salary), local high-quality state-owned enterprises rank third (with high cost performance), well-known private enterprises (such as BAT Huawei) rank fourth.
The top two with the lowest turnover rate are: one is a central enterprise, and the other is a high-quality state-owned enterprise. The first two things I regret most after leaving my job are: the first is central enterprises, and the second is high-quality state-owned enterprises.
Today's times are unpredictable, and stability and long-term stability have become "scarce resources". You see there are so many people in the national post exam, and the highest registration ratio of some popular candidates is 2000: 1.
90% of people in this world are ordinary people, and they don't expect to be rich and expensive, as long as they are stable for a long time. Like high-quality state-owned enterprises and civil servants, central enterprises have long-term stability.
Second, from the perspective of comprehensive cost performance, the comprehensive income of central enterprises and high-quality state-owned enterprises is higher than that of other enterprises. Statistics show that in 2065438+2008, the national social wage of state-owned enterprises exceeded 84,000 yuan, while that of private enterprises was less than 50,000 yuan.
From the perspective of high probability, the social wages of state-owned enterprises are much higher than those of private enterprises. Some people may say that the average annual salary of Internet companies and technology companies such as Huawei is 700,000. Even if this is true, it cannot represent the level of the whole private enterprise.