When preparing for the interview of interpersonal relationship questions, many students can master the thinking of answering questions and answer them fluently when they have just finished learning the theory. They think this kind of question is very simple, but they often ignore the preset situation and identity in the stem of the question, which leads to a seemingly smooth answer but ignores the key points of this kind of question, resulting in a "straight to the point" answer. For example, the old man went to your company to complain emotionally because he was resting at the construction site next door. You are a window worker. What should you do? In this topic, we can easily find that we urgently need to solve the emotional problems of the elderly, but many students just say, "I will calm the emotions of the elderly and then go to the construction site with him to understand the situation." Such an answer seems to have solved uncle's emotional problems, but the examiner didn't see how your resilience was. Moreover, we must substitute ourselves into the scene at that time and strengthen the portrayal. For example, "At this time, I will immediately let my colleagues take over my work, put up a sign of' Stop processing' when necessary, and then patiently tell my uncle not to get excited, and I will definitely help him solve the problem. Please speak slowly on the sofa and pour a cup of hot water before asking the old man for details. " In contrast, the latter can let the examiner know the specific way you solve the problem. Therefore, when we answer such questions, we will naturally enrich the content of the answers by depicting more scenes.
2. Pay attention to "explanation" and make "how to see" more vivid.
The topic represented by comprehensive analysis has always been the focus of the public examination interview. After most candidates master the idea of answering questions, because the analysis is too monotonous, they often fall into the trap of "thinking" and change their analysis content into some macro words, resulting in dry answers. For example, how to treat child abuse cases in kindergartens? When analyzing the causes of this incident, candidates can easily think of the lack of teachers' professional ethics. "The main reason is that some kindergarten teachers lack professional ethics." This answer is not impossible, but if they join later, "some teachers always think that they are students' managers, and they exercise parental management rights. It is their right to beat and scold students in the teaching process, which violates the minimum requirements of teachers for caring, guiding and serving candidates, and causes a series of illegal behaviors of students. This explanation will make our content more vivid and better reflect our own thinking on the topic.