Badminton and tennis are more inclined to show individual technical ability, while basketball is more inclined to team operation, and people's concentration per unit time in these three kinds of sports is also different.
Tennis is slow, the confrontation is not very intense, and it tends to be aerobic. Tennis matches are played for several hours, and if the same time is long, the amount of exercise is the least. To be responsible, the amount of exercise of badminton is definitely not as good as that of basketball. After a game, people are tired and paralyzed, especially in the final of two wins in three games, which is completely supported by perseverance and the amount of training every day is not large.
Badminton is the fastest of all ball games (provided data: the highest speed is 493km/h). Ordinary people can play at a speed close to 150 or 100, and it is relatively simple for a master to break 200. In tennis, if ordinary people play around 100, they will feel very high if they occasionally have a 150.
Antagonistic badminton and recreational badminton are completely different concepts. Recreational old badminton is for two people. Just hit the ball into the opponent's hand and make a small circle. Antagonistic badminton is to find a way to start for the other side. Many people only know badminton for entertainment.
Not to mention half-time, even in 5v5, there are plenty of opportunities to rest. It is impossible for both sides to continue the fast break. When dribbling at the 1 position, the players in other positions did not rest. Even if tactical actions are carried out, there will be no such exaggerated drills.
In all ball games, people think that football and basketball consume a lot of energy, but I'm sorry, compared with the high-quality badminton singles in a unit time, I'm afraid I have to admit defeat. Interestingly, if boxing is counted in sports, it ranks first in sports. Badminton's strength, timely response speed and starting steps are the same as boxing.