The first is the written test.
Because the civil service examination focuses on the candidates' logical thinking ability, planning and organization ability, information capture and application ability. , that is, focusing on application, basically does not involve a separate test theory. The focus of the review should be on the application, because everyone's scores are similar in the line test. As long as you do well in the application, you will stand out. For the review of the application, my personal experience is to look at the real questions over the years, have a macro understanding of the form of the examination questions, and then combine the corresponding answers (which are actually not standard answers) to preliminarily master the methods and means of answering questions. After doing this, you can systematically sort out the topics in the review materials at hand. In this process, it is very important to be good at summarizing the main points of answering questions, which is also the best way to provide you with the ability to apply for the exam. After a while, you have to find some questions from the internet to practice by yourself. You must start writing, seize the time, and then compare it with the examples of answers provided by others to see if there are any shortcomings. This kind of exercise doesn't need to be demanding, it's almost enough.
There is no skill in reviewing the administrative professional ability exam. If you accumulate enough knowledge at ordinary times, for example, from now on, you can pass the exam without reviewing, but it is necessary to be on the safe side. If you feel that some questions are unfamiliar, you can do some targeted exercises (there are many questions on the internet), but one thing to remember is that the score distribution of the questions is light first and then heavy. Some of the previous questions are only 0.5, some are 1 (but these questions are not easy to score), and the following analysis questions are generally 2 points (these questions are easy to score). It is suggested that the following questions be completed before the previous questions.
Next is the interview.
Civil servant interviews are basically structured interviews. The interview process generally begins with drawing lots to decide the admission order. The questions in the examination process are generally fixed at 4-5, and the examination time is about *** 10 minutes (the examiner will tell you clearly before the exam). Answer overtime will be deducted, and every candidate will be the same. Examiners mark papers (included in the examination time). When you listen to a question, you can make a short note with a pen and paper prepared for you in advance, and leave time for thinking before answering (these are counted in your answer time). According to personal interview experience, we should grasp the following principles:
First, the principle of politeness. When you enter the examination room and confidently walk to the answering table, you should bow to the examiner and say hello, and then sit down. In the process of answering questions, be sure to glance at every examiner (at least once), even the scorekeeper sitting next to you. Finally, in order to relieve your nervousness, you can set your eyes on the 1-2 examiner sitting in the middle and answer each question. Get up and bow to the examiner again to thank you, and then walk out of the examination room. This link seems to have nothing to do with the exam, but it is closely related to your score. This is called impression score.
Second, the answer should be hierarchical. With the sentence pattern of "first-second-second-last" or "first = second-third-summary", people feel that your thinking is clear and coherent (in fact, the specific content of your answer is not very important at this time), and you have the basic potential to be a civil servant, so you can get high marks again.
Third, you should be confident enough to express yourself, loud enough and calm enough. This is a test of whether you have stage fright and your ability to control the overall situation. In particular, if you encounter a relatively uncommon topic, you will be involuntarily timid, quiet, trembling and stuck in the inherent tension of the examination room. At this time, you just need to pause a little, take a deep breath, slow down your heart and answer questions in disguise. You can think about it in combination with the topic. Remember to list one, two and three, and don't care if what you say is right or wrong. You know, the investigation of adaptability is often shown from these details. If you can do this, even if your answer is far from the main question, it won't be too many points, and even extra points will be added.
Fourth, arrange the answer time reasonably, don't be deducted from overtime pay, and don't leave the scene too early.
Fifth, accurately judging the question type is to examine organizational ability? Planning ability (giving you the conditions to organize an activity)? Coordination ability (making plans under given conditions)? (for example, what should you do if the superior leader comes to inspect and the competent leader is absent) or logical thinking ability? Are you still used to it? Or comprehensively examine various abilities? Only by clarifying the question type can we answer effectively.
Note: savvy052 1 original answer, please indicate the source, thank you!