What if the terms of the contract are unreasonable but have been signed?

If the contract is unreasonable but has been signed, it shall be handled in the following ways:

1. If the contract is unreasonable, you can also protect your legitimate rights and interests through legal channels and apply for contract modification or dissolution;

2. The terms of the contract in obviously unfair belong to the obviously unfair contract. If it meets the requirements of obviously unfair, the contract can be changed and cancelled;

3. If one party takes advantage of its own advantages or the other party has no experience, which obviously violates the principle of reciprocal compensation, it can be regarded as obviously unfair.

The prosecution process of unreasonable contracts is as follows:

1, the parties sue. The indictment shall be submitted, and the corresponding number of copies shall be submitted according to the number of opponents;

2. According to the principle of "who advocates who gives evidence", the plaintiff should submit the materials of the plaintiff's subject qualification when suing the court. Such as identity cards, household registration books, passports, home visits for Hong Kong and Macao compatriots, etc. ;

3. When submitting documentary evidence to the court, the parties shall fill in the list of evidence in duplicate, indicating the name and pages of the evidence submitted;

4. The filing court shall, within seven days after the parties perform the necessary procedures and submit relevant evidence materials, handle the filing procedures for those who meet the filing conditions; Those who do not meet the conditions for filing a case shall be ruled inadmissible according to law.

To sum up, the terms of the contract in obviously unfair belong to the obviously unfair contract. If it meets the requirements of obviously unfair obviously, the contract can be changed and cancelled.

Legal basis:

Article 151 of the Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC)

If one party takes advantage of the situation that the other party is in a critical state and lacks judgment ability, resulting in obviously unfair when a civil juristic act is established, the injured party has the right to request the people's court or an arbitration institution to cancel it.