According to the points rules of the US Open series, if you win the ATP Masters (two stops in Toronto and Cincinnati this year) or the WTA 1 Tour (two stops in Cincinnati and Montreal this year), you can get 100 points, the runner-up will get 70 points, and the semi-finals,14 finals and18 finals will be held. In other lower-level competitions, you can get 70 points, 45 points for the runner-up, and 25 points for the finals of 1/4 and 1/8 and 15 respectively. If there are more than one player with the same total score, the ranking will be decided by comparing the winning and losing relationship of the US Open series in that year, the number of wins, the number of sets and the number of times of the US Open series in that year.
This integral system looks a bit cumbersome, but it is actually very simple to calculate. Six years before the US Open series, the player who finally ranked 1 in the men's singles scored only 175, which means that as long as he can win two masters championships in a row or win 1 champion and 1 Asian in the masters series, he can basically ensure to occupy the first place in the standings of the US Open series. Because there are only five races in the women's competition, there are even fewer chances to score points. Like Clijsters in 2005, it is difficult to replicate the situation that "Crazy" accumulated 225 points by winning three of five games. Basically, as long as you reach the finals in two 1 games, it is enough to get 140 points.
Specifically, we can see that Netease has a series of special reports on North America, which are very detailed. The website address is:/special/000501ba/useyesonmoney.html.
Give it to me. Haha