I formulation of principles:
1. Fairness: give priority to * *, giving consideration to particularity.
2. Orientation: it is conducive to the development of all work in the school and the all-round growth of teachers.
3. Democracy: The extensive participation of teaching staff is conducive to the objective and fair evaluation of the judges.
2. Evaluate items and scores
1. Master 3 points, Master 2 points, cumulative score.
2. Since assuming the present position, those who have passed the examination or above have an annual score of 1, which is calculated cumulatively.
3. Since the assessment, every 1 excellent assessment has scored 1 minute, which is calculated cumulatively.
4. Key teachers at the municipal level and academic leaders at the district level will be given 4 points, and key teachers at the district level will be given 2 points, which will be selected at the highest level.
5. Advanced titles at all levels (government level)
3 points for outstanding teachers and advanced educators in the district education system.
5 points for municipal education system, outstanding teachers at district level and advanced educators.
7 points for outstanding teachers, advanced educators and model workers at the municipal level.
Excellent teachers, advanced educators and model workers in China 10.
Each person chooses a highest grade score, which is based on the award certificate.
6. Since assuming the present position, as the person in charge of an independent scientific research project, 3 points are scored at the district level, 5 points at the municipal level and 7 points at the national level. (refers to planning and learning at all levels).
7. Scoring of scientific research achievements (including papers and courseware, etc.). Since I started my present job.
District-level first prize 3 points District-level second prize 2 points Third prize 1 point
The municipal first prize is 5 points, the municipal second prize is 3 points, and the municipal third prize is 2 points.
National first prize 10 points, national second prize 7 points and national third prize 4 points.
Refers to the annual evaluation of organizations above the district level. With the award certificate, each person chooses 1 top scientific research achievements and courseware scores.
8. Those who have published academic articles in official newspapers and periodicals since taking up their present posts will be scored 3 points. (If the number of words is more than 1 thousand words related to the declared discipline, discipline, education and management, score according to the highest standard)
9. 65,438+00 points for independent writing since assuming the present position; Editor-in-chief 4 points; Editorial Committee 2 points, according to the highest grade score, each person only remember one item, no duplication and cumulative calculation.
Three. Reporting and evaluation
1. Participants must attend the report.
2. The debriefing order is obtained by drawing lots.
3. The masses participate in democratic appraisal and do not participate in scoring.
4. All the judges participated in the appraisal and scored according to their work. The score is based on the standard of the first debriefer and fluctuates up and down. The total score is 63 points. By the working group to remove the highest and lowest scores, the average score is divided into debriefing points. Announce the results in the judges, and all information will be sealed as files.
Note: the judges' scores are seriously inconsistent with the opinions of the masses. Please refer to the opinions of the masses.
Four. system of selection
1. Project evaluation score+judges evaluation score = total score
2. Line up according to the scores from high to low, and determine the recommended candidates. In case of a tie, the judging committee will vote.
Scope of application of verb (abbreviation of verb)
1. These rules apply to all participating teachers. All participants must have all participation qualifications.
2. Participants must seek truth from facts. Once found to be fraudulent, they will be disqualified from participating in the year.