What do you think of Peng Yuchang's movie The Burning Wild Child's Sky?

Where is the ugliness? Young, mentally retarded, bored and illogical, all the characters are basically instrumental, the whole story is off-line, and the rhythm is basically broken. What about singing and dancing? I don't understand the dance part. If I don't evaluate it, the song part will be lacking. If there is any merit in this film, then its theme expression is at least positive, such as the golden thread extracted from the core, "Isn't there something more important in life than victory?" For example, lose happily! "Zamo Zamo makes sense. I think it would be best if the film handed this sentence to the film itself and accepted the collapse of word of mouth happily, frankly and happily.

What story did the movie tell? The old dog played by Peng Yuchang transferred to a middle school in Haikou and met three roommates in the second year of high school. This middle school is opposite to another girls' middle school. Xiao Huang, a girl in middle school, loves dancing, but in the dance team, teachers always don't like the existence of players being bullied by others. A group of lonely high school students always want to do something important in their youth, so the old dog and Huang Xiao teamed up to participate in the dance competition, even if they lost, they would not regret it. It is said that such a story as a youth film model is not too bad, but the final appearance of "Burning Sky and Wild Boys" is extremely embarrassing, and the movie plot has nothing to do with it, mixed with some boring jokes. In the core scene, the traces of forced touch, forced burning or forced mind wandering can almost be seen by the naked eye.

After watching the first scene of the movie, I almost began to feel embarrassed. Xiao Huang is late for dance team training. Being short, he stood on tiptoe and tried to be even with his teammates. The teacher synchronized the information of the previous dance competition, and then the whole dance team began to make fun of Xiao Huang. Together with the teacher, almost everyone else in this school is blurred into a helpless villain. As for why? Because Xiao Huang is short and sells salted fish at home, I fully understand that the film wants to position the protagonist as an unwelcome "little yellow duck", but there is no need to write such a brief introduction as soon as it comes up, and there is no need to enlarge it to this extent. In the first 80% of the time, as long as Xiao Huang appears and there are other students next to him, it will be accompanied by noisy and repeated teasing and ridicule, but suddenly a certain one.

Film reviews are also full of puzzling. In the film, the roofs of two schools are connected with iron frames, and people can crawl on them, but it is very dangerous to visually inspect them. There is a scene where an old dog and Huang Xiao are holding iron bars in the air. Seeing this scene, I really don't understand the intention of the film. This is neither the result of an emergency nor the reason why their relationship must not be sublimated. Why do you have to arrange a scene? The two monks were confused. Apart from attracting attention, I can't think of any need for guest scenes of stars such as Andrew and Carman Lee. Those boring scenes are really boring.