After the interview, the faculty and staff put forward unqualified:
Judging from the examiner's expression, if the examiner has a favorable expression or has communication, then generally speaking, it means that your interview is better and you don't need to reply. This situation is more likely to pass. However, if you feel that your audition or structural performance is poor, and the examiner is expressionless or impatient, then there is a high probability that you have failed.
Matters needing attention in teaching interview.
1, revealing personal information. Some students are either too nervous or unprepared. It's easy to blurt out one's name, graduation institution and registered permanent residence. However, this expression may often be judged by the examiner as a violation of the examination room. Of course, in some exams, the examiner will confirm the information of the candidates by asking their names. If the examiner takes the initiative to ask questions, candidates can answer them.
2. Lack of etiquette in the examination room. In fact, most candidates who participate in the interview of teaching resources have good self-cultivation habits. However, in the actual examination, we still found that some candidates were too nervous, stiff-faced, inflexible and disrespectful to the examiner. Examiners sometimes ask questions to candidates after their speeches or lectures.
At this time, even if you can't answer completely, you should pay attention to your response attitude. Some candidates are emotional. Some candidates argue with the examiner. I don't know. The examiner is the one who decides our score. When there are questions or questions, explanation is far more effective than persuading the examiner.
3. The lecture ideas are not clear. Some candidates do not prepare enough lessons before the exam, which leads to stumbling and incoherence in the examination room. It is impossible to present the content to the examiner more clearly. One of the reasons for this problem is that some candidates have no substitute experience before, have no general grasp of the teaching content, can't distinguish between key points and non-key points in the actual trial teaching process, and have no good design of the teaching content. The other part is that their own logic is poor and their own ability is not enough to sort out the course content well.
Don't repeat the last sentence. This is a common problem. Candidates are generally in a state of extreme tension in the examination room and their thinking is stagnant. In order to avoid the blank, many candidates will unconsciously repeat the last sentence or the last few sentences, although they make up for the short blank of thinking and gain time for the next sentence. But I didn't know that this move amplified my nervousness and made the examiner question the ability of the candidates. Originally, the examiner's attention was not on the examinee, but the unconscious repetition was actually reminding the examiner to pay attention to himself.
Hints of failure in teaching interview.
Tips for failure of teaching interview:
1, the examiner basically doesn't respond to students who don't perform very well.
2, the content is not well grasped, and the examiner's questions during the defense did not satisfy the examiner.
3. The atmosphere is rather awkward. The examiner didn't finish calling and didn't reply.
4. The examiner is slow and indifferent to the whole process.
5. The atmosphere is rather awkward. The examiner didn't finish calling and didn't reply.
However, the performance of the teaching interview is as follows:
1. During the interview and trial lecture, the whole trial lecture was incomplete and some missing links were not mentioned.
2. stuttering or making serious mistakes during the trial.
3. I was too nervous during the interview, and the whole person did not relax, which did not meet the good interview conditions.
How does the teaching interview imply disqualification?
Omit the defense link and let you go directly. Of course, it may be because your speech is not good, so you didn't let the defense.
During the teaching interview, the interviewer will score on the spot, but he won't tell you the score on the spot. I don't know if I am qualified until I check my grades in the teaching interview.
But whether the teaching interview is qualified or not can actually be felt by the examiner's reaction during the interview. Of course, the interviewer will not intentionally hint at the test results of the candidates. The hints that candidates can feel are actually subtle. The following textbooks have passed the interview and are for reference only. In fact, of course, it is based on the scores of the results query.
Interview skills of teacher qualification certificate:
The general interview time is about 10 minutes. The interview is divided into two parts: lecture and examiner's question. The interview results are qualified or unqualified.
Interview requirements: no information, just ask and answer, talk and communicate. Dignified appearance, decent dress, generous behavior, elegant temperament and good morality. Use Mandarin, the language is clear, fluent, accurate, complete and infectious. Answer questions about the subjects to be taught and the basic knowledge of pedagogy, psychology and related majors.
The lecture will give 10 minutes to prepare, and then tell this passage in the form of a lecture, that is, to teach students. Answer two questions before speaking and two questions after speaking, mainly emphasizing situational teaching.
Matters needing attention in the interview of teacher qualification certificate:
1, the day before the exam, try to relax. If you are too nervous, you can adjust it through self-suggestion, scenario simulation and thinking.
2. The interview admission ticket has the specific time of the exam, so you can arrange the time reasonably according to the time on the admission ticket. The senior lecturer of studious education reminds candidates that the time to arrive at the examination place should be half an hour earlier than the time stipulated in the admission ticket. Remember that time control is not good, and haste will affect the exam status.
Tips for failure of teaching interview
Tips for failure of teaching interview
In our daily life, work and study, everyone must have known about the supplementary examination to some extent. The following are the tips I collected for you about the failure of the teaching assistant interview, which are for reference only and I hope to help you.
Hint of failure in teaching interview 1
Tips that the fund interview may not pass:
1, the examiner didn't respond all the time, and the response was cold;
2, the content is not well grasped, and the examiner's questions during the defense did not satisfy the examiner;
3. The atmosphere is rather awkward. I didn't call the examiner and didn't reply.
Tips for failure of teaching interview 2
First, coping skills
The lottery interview refers to determining some questions that need to be answered by candidates before the exam according to the needs of the post, and making question labels. After the candidates enter the venue, they will answer the questions on the question label by drawing lots on the spot. Generally speaking, the number of questions depends on the number of candidates, and each question contains 1-3 questions. In the process of answering questions, the examiner grades the candidates according to the answers to the questions prepared before the interview and the overall performance of the candidates when answering this question.
The advantages of this interview method are simple operation, definite scores and easy mastery of objectivity and fairness of scores. The disadvantages are narrow scope, lack of pertinence and flexibility, and poor mastery of the mode of "written test+oral answer", which is not conducive to candidates to play their unique advantages. In addition, due to the different test questions selected by different candidates, it is difficult to be completely equivalent, which means that candidates applying for the same position may face different test questions with different difficulties, which brings unfair factors to the evaluation and compromises comparability.
Second, the implementation procedures of the lottery defense
Preparatory cutting
The first step: make a defense plan and establish a leading body. On the basis of completing the written examination, according to the announcement of recruiting cadres, the whole process of defense is analyzed, and the content, purpose, object, organization method, implementation procedure, examiner composition, scoring method, admission ratio, etc. of defense are determined, so that the defense organization has rules to follow. At the same time, organize the leaders of personnel departments and employers to form an authoritative leading body to ensure that the whole defense work is led, organized and planned.
Step 2: Review the defense qualification and issue a Notice of Defense. Qualification examination is a method to initially determine the respondent according to the registration and written test results. Its purpose: First, to verify whether candidates are qualified to participate in the defense according to the conditions for entering the examination. The second is to verify the accuracy of the written test results. In fact, the qualified winners will be included in the list of candidates for defense and announced. At the same time, the candidates will be issued "Instructions for Defense", and the defense procedures, content forms and scoring methods will be made public to ensure the standardization of the procedures and the fairness of the defense.
The third step: determine the content of the defense and do the topic. Defense is not only a supplement and extension to the written test effect, but also a process of "two-way communication" with candidates directly. On the basis of written examination, it is to further examine the comprehensive situation of candidates' ability, quality, work experience and energy, so as to truly give examiners a more comprehensive and objective three-dimensional image and provide sufficient basis for selecting suitable talents. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the interview content according to the requirements of the proposed position, focusing on:
1. professional knowledge: master the depth and breadth of post professional skills and necessary professional subject knowledge and the ability to use them flexibly.
2、
3. Comprehensive analysis ability: have certain analysis, judgment, summary and generalization ability, and explain the problem thoroughly, comprehensively and clearly.
4. Organizational management ability: Have certain ability to organize, coordinate and handle specific affairs.
5. Language expression and adaptability: I can accurately express my thoughts, opinions and opinions in words and characters, and have the ability to self-adjust the environment and immediately enter the role.
6. Natural quality: healthy, energetic, quick thinking, able to understand questions quickly and accurately, and answer them in time.