Is there a difference between the concepts of the old clan aristocracy and the slave owner aristocracy in Athens?

Solon's democratic reform has the following manifestations:

1. He established 10 regional tribes to replace the original four clan tribes. Athens is divided into urban area, coastal area and inland area, and each area is divided into ten parts, which is called trinity area. By drawing lots, a trinity area is drawn from each region to synthesize a regional tribe. Trinity is divided into several Demos (autonomous village societies), which constitute the basic units of political, social and religious activities of Athenian citizens. Young men who have reached the age of 18 in Athens can obtain citizenship through a certain naturalization ceremony in Demos where their parents belong. Some foreigners also obtained Athenian citizenship in Demos. In this way, the principle of region replaced the principle of consanguinity and weakened the influence of clan nobles in all aspects.

2. Establish a "500-person meeting" to replace the original "400-person meeting";

(The 500-member conference shall be composed of 50 citizens from 65,438+00 tribes at all levels, each of whom shall be elected by drawing lots;

The conference composed of 500 members enjoys great power and is open to citizens of all classes;

(c) During the closing of the Congress, he was responsible for handling most city-state affairs.

3. Cristini has also strengthened the activities of citizens' congresses and people's courts. According to his suggestion, the law of banishing shells (or pottery pieces) was made to prevent the tyrant from reappearing.

When you say old clan aristocrats, you mean the aristocratic system with the principle of consanguinity as the identity standard. Now the upstarts refer to the rules that supported Solon's reform, and they were the progressive forces at that time.

In fact, those so-called "slave owners' nobles" still belong to the old clan nobles, just because they stood in the right direction and won, so they are progressive. This is what history calls "success or failure". The same person, just changed identities. Therefore, reforms can often not be completely subverted, because you have to win the support of the old forces. Revolution is different.

For example, the British still retain the queen, but the privileges of the queen are not as great as before. This is also the case.