First, it violates the regulations and opens the door for fraud.
! Article 3 of the "Six Measures" stipulates: "Under the supervision of the discipline inspection and supervision department, all candidates will determine the order of participating in the interview by drawing lots according to the positions they apply for."
2. In order not to let the examiner know the personal information of the candidates in advance, there is fraud. Article 3 of the "Six Measures" also stipulates: "During the interview, the staff only publishes the examination serial number of the candidates, and does not disclose the candidates' names, work units, graduation institutions and other relevant personal information. The examiner grades the candidates according to the published lottery serial number. "This provision of the Municipal Personnel Bureau is the key to prevent fraud in the examination room. According to this regulation, before the end of the interview, the staff and examiners can only know the lottery number of the candidates, and they must never know the registration number and name of the candidates. Because, if the staff and examiner get both the lottery serial number and the candidate's registration serial number and name before the interview, it provides an opportunity for fraud.
However, after the candidates entered the venue at 7: 30 am on April 20, only two staff members, one man and one woman, presided over the lottery in Hebei District, and no personnel from the discipline inspection and supervision department were present to supervise. Then, the staff asked each candidate to sign his own lottery number and name on the form printed with the candidate's registration number and name. Then, take this form away at once. In this way, the staff tied the key information of the candidates' registration number, lottery number, name and so on without supervision and illegal operation before the exam, which gave the examiners in Hebei the time and opportunity to know this important information before the interview and provided conditions for fraud. The interview doesn't officially start until eight o'clock. Since most of the staff and examiners in the interview examination room are from Hebei District, whether the interview results are true and fair is the key. Then the abnormal distribution of interview results just proves this point.
Second, it is suspected of fraud, and the interview results are doubtful.
On April 29th, the Municipal Personnel Bureau announced the comprehensive scores of 77 candidates who participated in the job interview of the member (I) of Hebei Urban Management Comprehensive Law Enforcement Bureau. As long as you look at this form carefully, it is not difficult to find that 25 people who entered the medical examination in Hebei District had already decided before the interview, and the interview was suspected of fraud:
A total of 25 people were recruited for this position, and the interview scores of 25 candidates who entered the medical examination were all above 86.3 points. Of the 52 people who did not enter the physical examination, 5 1 person's interview score was below 76.3 points, which was exactly 10 points different from the minimum score for entering the physical examination. Only 1 person scored 78.8 points. If 25 candidates were not identified in advance and suspected of fraud, there would not be such a wide gap in interview results: 25 people scored extremely high, 52 people scored extremely low, and there was a blank area with as high as 7.5 points in the middle!
According to the calculation method that one point in the interview is equal to two points in the written test, (total score = written test score /4+ interview score /2) the difference between 90 points in the interview and 70 points is equal to 40 points in the written test. In this way, the interview results of illegal operation in Hebei district have become the decisive factor in enrolling candidates.
The above bizarre interview results appear because six measures stipulate that the results will be announced immediately after the whole interview, which greatly limits the time for behind-the-scenes operation. In desperation, in order to ensure that the default candidates can be admitted, they will score high on other candidates! The fairness of this illegal interview is questionable! Thanks to the "six measures", people have discovered the secret of black-box interview in Hebei District! See the extremely dark side!
Take a closer look at this comprehensive report card, and you can also find some very abnormal problems:
For example, among the 25 people who entered the physical examination, the difference between the highest score of 92.4 and the lowest score of 86.3 was only 6.1; There is a blank area of 7.5 points between the 25th and 26th in the interview.
Another example: extremely abnormal interview results directly led to the questioning result of the total score. The total score of the 25th place is 70. 1, which is 4.45 points away from the 26th place's 65.65! Among the 77 interview candidates, only these two candidates have such a big difference in total scores.
Third, believe in the public's ability to judge right and wrong.
Now that the recruitment of civil servants is about to begin, I believe in the public's ability to judge right and wrong. Open the truth through the internet (together with the "comprehensive report form"). Suggestion: Under the supervision of the media and the public, the interview should be conducted again in strict accordance with scientific and rigorous procedures, and the candidates should be fair and the image of the government should be maintained.