This Committee, which has not played any role, is in name only. The provisions on civil rights in the Code have not changed the reality. However, we can see from here that this law is not a concession to the poor, but deprives them of their civil rights. The central content of this law is two, that is, the change of election method. There are two meanings here: First, the nobles are more equal. Who is elected and who is not elected is not decided by the aristocratic meeting, but by the citizens drawing lots. If the property conditions are qualified, you can be an official as long as you draw lots. Second, the middle class has certain rights. Although the higher property standards ensure that the highest power in Athens is in the hands of the nobility, the nobility can no longer completely monopolize the official position, and the middle-class citizens in Athens can be elected as middle-and lower-level officials in Athens by lottery. This not only adjusted the relationship between aristocrats, but also adjusted the relationship between aristocrats and the middle class, which expanded the foundation of the ruling class to some extent.
Of course, this reform did not change the oligarchy of Athens, nor did it change the aristocratic system of Athens. The broad masses of lower-class civilians still have no political rights. They are the "people" of Athens, not the "masters" of Athens. Delacour code only changed the old customary law into words. Although it can limit the tyranny of the aristocracy to a certain extent, it still maintains the dictatorship of the aristocracy in essence. Far from meeting the requirements of the broad masses of civilians, it intensified the contradiction between civilians and nobles. At the beginning of the 6th century BC, Athenian civilians began to brew an armed uprising, and the nobles were shocked by the news, so they were forced to choose Solon as consul and began Solon's reform.