1. scientificity: evaluation should follow scientific theories and methods, establish scientific evaluation indicators and evaluation models, ensure scientific and credible evaluation results, and avoid subjective assumptions and blind evaluation.
2. Objectivity: the evaluation should be objective, based on the principles of fairness, openness, fairness and recognition, minimize the interference of subjective factors, and ensure the objectivity of the evaluation results based on objective data and facts.
3. Fairness: The evaluation should be fair, open and transparent, ensure the fairness of the evaluation process, fully listen to the opinions and suggestions of all relevant stakeholders, and avoid the influence of any individual or organization on the evaluation results.
4. Credibility: the evaluation should be reliable, the evaluation data should be accurate and reliable, the evaluation process should be carried out in strict accordance with the prescribed procedures, and the evaluation methods and indicators should be fully demonstrated.
5. Practicality: the evaluation should have practical and operational significance, and the evaluation results should provide accurate basic data and scientific analysis for the formulation of poverty alleviation policies and decisions, and provide strong support for further promoting poverty alleviation work.
Post-poverty assessment aims to summarize the experience of poverty alleviation, find out the problems and shortcomings in poverty alleviation, inherit the practical experience of poverty alleviation with a scientific attitude, provide scientific reference for future poverty alleviation and development, and promote new progress and achievements in poverty alleviation in China.