1,
The overall quality of the overall quality is also relatively simple: the main idea becomes the laws and regulations of vocational education, with morality, culture and basic skills, and so on. These well-educated people should be no strangers. I've never seen a pig run and I've never seen you for so many years-at school, some of these things are more or less known. So don't pay too much attention to this project. Except for the professional concept, the law requires two chapters, and the rest can be done in it.
These basic abilities, like cultural literacy, are all a person's cultural heritage, and the annual exam is uncertain. For example, I asked a lot of questions in those days, and I don't think it has anything to do with the education exam: did Huangmei Opera apply for a world heritage? What is the battle written in Du Mu's poem "The East Wind is inconvenient, Zhou Lang and Joe are locked in spring"? , and so on. These things are unpredictable and unpredictable, so don't spend too much time on them. Basic skills: writing and reading. They don't want to brush, but it's not too late to be a teacher.
2. Educational knowledge and ability
This part is very complicated, and there is no reason to support anything more than you.
Education foundation, student guidance, class management, subject knowledge, teaching design, teaching practice and teaching evaluation.
Each module has many trivial items based on education, involving a lot of educational content, and opening up any field of pedagogy for educators to watch, whether it is the first time-there are many plots. I suggest you take the time to look at the listed books and writing forms. You need to know-for example, Dewey gives the name of the multiple-choice question, and you choose from the options of the teaching philosophy line, so as to meet the requirements. Instead of remembering names and dates, it makes no sense.
Student guidance, class management, subject knowledge, teaching design, teaching practice and teaching evaluation.
Behind it is recitation-of course, it's not just rote memorization, which will not pay off, but will settle down. After all, I am an engineering student, and taking the teacher qualification exam is just a hobby. How can I have the strength to turn over a thick book again? In fact, being mentioned as higher is a skill.
3. Writing skills
I'm going to take the 20 12 senior high school entrance examination. I just thought of a busy engineering student. The exam is to get an extra card. At that time, I took the vocational education teacher exam with me-they worked as teachers for nearly ten years, and because they knew the invigilator and didn't stop them from cheating, they used small notes and mobile phones to enter the examination room. From a moral point of view, it becomes very interesting, which in itself makes the exam-isn't it funny that a qualified person makes the teacher cheat? The irony of this result is that these teachers have many years of work experience and cheat sheets, and none of them have passed the exam. Maybe you can see these unqualified teachers, maybe we can see the role that the so-called qualification examination and screening of excellent teachers can't play.
The examination time can be said to be very tight, and most of the topics, responsibly speaking, are unknown to you-you may have seen similar topics or separate topics, but it can be said that it is impossible to read the original title. (especially to check the comprehensive quality of knowledge in many disciplines)
Therefore, I advise those who want to take cheat sheets not to do interesting things.
I bought two well-known provincial counseling books, which were simply packaged and printed. They are published by the Provincial Teachers College. Less than half of the newspapers have been published, but there are also a quarter-sized Xinhua dictionary, but it is really full of printed words. Imagine the length of a whole book is very large. On the cover, it says: 100% coverage test range. It is affirmed that these books are often messy, covering all the contents of the exam as much as possible, considering how this is not two areas.
However, if you plan to memorize both books, I think it is very unrealistic.
So the first thing you should consider when preparing for the written test is to read the outline! ! This is very important! No matter what reference books you buy, look for the outline of that year first!
I must buy reference books and syllabuses. Although this book is not underlined, nor does it emphasize the background of any trace, the focus of the outline obviously refers to you: what do you want to browse, what you recite should be familiar with and what will be applicable.
For example, I choose several syllabus items:
Understand the basic knowledge of extracurricular activities in primary schools-that is, the maximum probability of choice is not about
& gt The basic methods of elementary classes can be mastered-that is to say, Q has a high probability to make clear the introduction of dictation.
The actual class and students can analyze the class phenomenon and daily management problems according to their own characteristics-this means that the probability of analysis is high, just like the "master", we must recite and write, and understand the case analysis.
Understanding the existing life experience, knowledge and ability, and learning and experiencing new learning content-not only means memorizing, but also means deeply understanding and answering questions in any abnormal situation.
Quickly search for answers according to the syllabus, and prepare one after another according to the degree of "learning, mastering, analyzing and understanding", saving time and effort. In addition, although it is impossible to prepare the original question, it can be said that no one will give you a complete and strange feeling of the topic.
4. Teaching
Although practical ability is also a written test subject, it is written separately for the sake of rationality and objectivity because it is a relatively professional content clause. The theme is different.
The only thing I want to say is that the preparation technology will be investigated here. There will be a big problem, such as preparing lessons, writing evaluation skills, preparing lessons with terms you understand and so on. These contents are very strange to me. I believe that many people with abnormal academic qualifications are the same. Need to buy related self-study books. I have about a week to finish this part. Because here you don't need to remember that what you need is to understand and apply concepts. Just browse and scan more. Try to write a reference according to your writing courseware.
I won't say much about the topics related to this topic. If you can't do the subject well, you will still be a teacher if you don't do it.
5, oral
The oral part is not very difficult either. For the teacher himself, it is hundreds of times-none of the teachers have passed the exam. . . This person really needs to reflect. But for the abnormal amateurs in the graduating class, it is still terrible. As a man with few words, usually an engineering woman, she can hardly speak at ordinary times. How was the lecture?
But still ready to suffer humiliation.
You will be given your name when you speak, and you will be asked to draw questions on the podium. After you finish, you will be given half an hour to write a lesson plan, and then you will go directly to the finish line.
Attention must be focused on your lesson plan, but you must be clear about why you need to do this step. Examination also needs innovative teaching, so that students can have an interactive, participatory and better accepted knowledge method. This must be written in it. For similar related items, there will be comments on oral topics, which must be rewritten and understood.
Before evaluation
Toastmasters will ask you some moral questions-what about you?' Good children study',' Why do you become a teacher' and so on. Then the speech.
In a somewhat funny way.
This speech is actually a one-man show. You have to pretend that you interact with the audience, and you have to pretend that you are a charming teacher. Speak coherently I won't say much if I say it loudly. Similar to a job interview, you can't break your word.
One thing to note is. I'm going to take it orally before the opening ceremony-it's very important. Although it seems that nothing has been taught, a good beginning is half the battle. If you ignore this, they can start thinking about live broadcast. But such a thing, then you will often-in "What should I say first?" -Because it's embarrassing.
In the process of teaching according to the teaching plan, there is no deviation from the teaching plan
Complete the course
After that, the judges will ask you three questions You must give a reasonable answer. There is nothing wrong with saying ordinary things yourself. Why do you say this here-the question I was asked is related to the relevant lecture content and teaching plan? Do you think you interact with your classmates? Easy to accept? In the final analysis, it is directly related to the lesson plan you wrote, so when writing the design lesson plan, you didn't lift a rock to drop it on your own feet.
six
Finally, sum up.
Comprehensive quality: the first two chapters focus on the back.
Educational knowledge and ability: written focus!
Teaching knowledge and ability: solid skills in preparing lessons and professional practice.
Speaking of: prepare opening remarks, prepare textbooks and lesson plans to make them stand up; Focus on interaction.