Composition correction is an important part of composition teaching and an effective means to improve students' writing level. There are various ways to correct the composition. This paper shares some skills on how to effectively correct senior high school composition, so as to choose the appropriate way to correct composition according to different purposes, improve teachers' labor efficiency and improve students' writing level and ability.
Keywords: composition correction method, advantages and disadvantages, effect, optimization, comprehensive application
Composition teaching is half of Chinese teaching. The process of composition teaching is a process in which students learn and understand writing knowledge, form writing ability, develop intelligence, improve ideological understanding and aesthetic taste under the guidance of teachers. Usually, a composition training process is a complete control process, which generally includes the following five links: (1) teachers' proposition, students' preparation; (2) Teachers' guidance and students' ideas; (3) Teachers answer questions and students write; (4) Teachers correct and students correct themselves; (5) Teachers' comments and students' summaries. Composition correction is one of the effective methods to improve students' writing ability. However, in the actual composition teaching process, many teachers pay attention to guidance, writing and commenting, but not enough attention to correction, which makes the composition teaching system out of touch, commenting and developing for a long time, leading to the decline of students' writing interest and low writing level. Improving students' writing level is an unshirkable task for our Chinese teachers.
I think according to the object of composition correction, it can be divided into two ways: teacher correction and student correction. First of all, talk about the teacher's correction. This method of correcting the composition is nothing more than the following: (1) correcting it batch by batch; (2) face batch; (3) Fine batch and fine modification for some parts, and micro batch for other parts; (4) Select one or two representative demonstration amendments. One of the advantages of these composition correction methods is that teachers can understand students' writing level from the following aspects: (1) See if the topic is consistent with the content; (2) see if the beginning is concise; (3) See if there is a connection between paragraphs; (4) see if it is taken care of before and after; (5) See whether punctuation marks are correct; (6) see if the font is neat; (7) See whether the words and sentences are accurate and vivid; (8) See if the thinking is correct, novel and profound. Of course, you can also understand students' ideological status, outlook on life, values and world outlook. Teachers should combine strict requirements with improving students' writing enthusiasm, praise them appropriately and criticize them seriously. This way of correcting composition can help teachers effectively understand students' writing level and mentality, and facilitate teachers to choose appropriate composition teaching methods. Did the enemy take aim? , the right medicine, improve students' writing ability, cultivate students' interest in writing. Let's talk about the advantages and disadvantages of these composition correction methods first.
Batch-by-batch correction is the most traditional way to correct compositions, which seems to be the most? The truth of God? At present, it is the most commonly used way for Chinese teachers to correct their compositions, and it is also the way recognized by the society and parents at present. The advantage of this method is that it corrects students' compositions comprehensively and carefully from content and structure to language and volume. This paper not only points out the reasons for students' mistakes in composition, but also points out the methods to correct them. It can not only praise achievements, but also put forward further requirements. If this method is used well, it will bring great benefits to students. It can help students understand the advantages and disadvantages of composition, strengthen practice more pertinently and improve the level of composition. It helps to improve students' writing ability, strengthen their ideological and moral cultivation and develop their intelligence. Make composition correction truly become an important communication platform between teachers and students in composition teaching, enhance the friendship and understanding between teachers and students, and let students feel that teachers are always paying attention to him. This correction method is also of great benefit to teachers to understand the actual level of students' compositions and facilitate teaching students in accordance with their aptitude. The disadvantage of this method is that the workload is very heavy, and composition correction is like a mountain on the Chinese teacher, which is very laborious. To this end, many teachers have moved their brains and thought of some ideas: correct, but just pass by; There are explanations and comments, but they are often executed every other article; Browse it again and get one point; The alternate use of two composition books is a protracted war. But these practices are still superficial and passive, and they have not jumped out? Teacher-oriented? This framework. What is its real function? I found that many students just looked at the scores or whispered each other's composition scores and put the words aside. Some students don't even bother to turn over the text, just waiting for new composition questions. The teacher's sweat became useless, and the criticism of red eyebrows became a hole in the students' eyes. If this correction method is not used well, it is easy to form a teacher's arranged substitution, which will affect students' initiative and enthusiasm in writing.
Face-to-face composition correction has all the advantages of batch-to-batch correction, and it is more direct, which is what many students dream of. I have personal experience in composition teaching. Face-to-face criticism can teach students writing skills well and improve their writing level to the greatest extent. At the same time, students obviously feel an honor, receive a kind of attention, feel the teacher's serious and responsible work attitude, and arouse students' emotions. Once I corrected a composition for a student with an average writing level, and then I happened to see him writing in his diary? Unexpectedly, today the teacher corrected my composition face to face! I am touched that the teacher is so sincere and kind. I have memorized everything the teacher said. I must write every composition in the future. From the teacher's trusting eyes, I believe I will write every composition well. After guidance, the students' writing level has really improved, and they got full marks in the composition of the senior high school entrance examination in 2002. It can be seen that face-to-face criticism is indeed an effective way to correct composition, but it has its own insurmountable shortcomings: now students have heavy learning tasks, teachers have tight teaching time, and face-to-face criticism can only be carried out individually, which is difficult to do in practice, let alone promote.
Let's talk about these methods of correcting compositions.
Self-correction is the most basic and direct way to correct compositions. After the students finish the composition, they will conduct self-assessment and self-assessment. The method of students' self-correction can delegate the power of correction to students to the maximum extent, so that students can turn passive into active and become the masters of correction. Ye Shengtao attaches great importance to students' self-improvement. He said: there is a close relationship between correction and writing, and the priority of correction should belong to the author of the composition, so I think composition teaching should focus on cultivating students' ability of self-correction. ? Ye Lao repeatedly stressed: If the focus is on cultivating students' ability to correct mistakes, the teacher only gives some guidance and guidance. How to correct mistakes for students to consider and decide for themselves, isn't the student in the active position? Cultivate your ability to change and benefit for life. ? Isn't it great to be able to correct mistakes by yourself without asking others to correct them, and often take the initiative? Indeed, self-correction can make students experience the fun of correcting with their own hands, their own brains, their own language and their own way, thus improving their composition level in happiness. Before correcting, teachers should stipulate certain review contents according to the training requirements, and gradually develop the good habit of students' self-recognition. Before correcting, teachers should stipulate certain review contents according to the training requirements, and gradually develop the good habit of students' self-recognition. For example, students are required to underline the sentences they think are the best in writing, so that teachers can pay attention to these sentences when correcting them. Another example is the revision of the format. The basic score is 60 points (that is, everyone who can hand in the composition has this score), and only the format is correct, and the correct one can get full marks; Another example is the correction of typos, which is based on 60 points. If there is no typo in the whole article, you can get full marks, 2 points deducted 10, 4 points deducted 20 points, and so on. If you deduct 40 points, you won't deduct it. This operation is simple, students' writing enthusiasm is not easy to be hit, and their interest in correcting will increase with the increase of correcting times, which will eventually form a good habit of self-correction. The disadvantage of this method is that students' level is limited, and their writing ability, appreciation ability and correction ability are still relatively shallow. Sometimes, no matter how they change, they can't get rid of some shortcomings or even fallacies of the article, especially poor students, and it is difficult to achieve good results, which teachers should pay attention to.
Collective correction This is a method of correcting compositions collectively. Composition correction is a kind of reading, a kind of spiritual communication, a kind of enjoyment and an improvement. Therefore, students' sense of participation can not be ignored. Push students to the other side of writing? Review, let them learn from each other and learn from each other. Kong Ziyun:? A threesome requires a teacher. ? This way encourages students to actively participate and mobilize students? For the teacher? Desire, arouse the interest of composition correction, and show some manuscripts in your own creation to create a positive atmosphere. In this way, we should pay attention to the composition distribution of a certain number of students in each group and complete the task of correcting in a certain time. The number should not be too large, otherwise students will not be able to complete the task, which will affect the quality of marking. At the beginning, the students in the group can correct two compositions in one class, and they can add more later. This kind of group mutual approval and revision activity can also provide students with opportunities to learn from each other, which is conducive to cultivating students' team spirit, cultivating students' ability to explore problems, cultivating students' serious and responsible attitude and developing good writing habits. ? Learning is like a seedling in spring. If you don't see its increase, you will be stronger every day. Students have gradually formed a strong interest in composition in correcting each other. If we recognize some methods of composition, we will get unexpected results. This role exchange can also make them feel the hardship of changing the article, and then respect the teacher's work more. At the same time, it also makes teachers dizzy? Labor? Get out of it.
Correcting each other is a way for students to exchange corrections. This method is simple and easy. Let me say a few more words here. Before the change, the scope of the change was also set by the teacher, and then the students changed it. This kind of correction can enable students to exchange correction opinions in time, just like a teacher's face-to-face criticism of a composition. If you don't understand something, you can discuss it with the author immediately and study his original intention and intention of writing in order to achieve a more favorable purpose of revision. This way can overcome the defects of self-correction to a certain extent, and can promote and improve each other through mutual error correction among students. Specifically, it has the following advantages: First, after many corrections, students not only accurately remember the basic requirements of writing, but also have a deeper understanding of these requirements. He will instruct others how to write and how not to write, which will naturally enhance his writing ability. Second, everyone has the opportunity to read many students' compositions, so it is easy to find and learn from others' strengths. It is also a good thing to learn from others' shortcomings, and students' ideas also have an opportunity to exchange and develop with each other. Third, every time you grade a composition, each person only approves one copy, and the burden is not heavy. Every time you draw lots to change people, the people you change are fresh and interested. Each student's composition is approved by another student every time, so it is certainly fresh to see different students' comments on themselves. This freshness is conducive to cultivating students' interest in correcting compositions and reading other people's comments. Fourthly, when correcting compositions, students should think from the perspective of the reviser and the role of the teacher, which is conducive to enhancing students' psychological adaptability, psychological balance and role exchange and promoting their psychological maturity. Fifth, teachers only look at and read some students' correction results, and read many compositions in a short time, which is beneficial for teachers to think more, maintain a strong interest in reading, and easily stimulate teachers' intellectual potential and creative potential. It can also save a lot of time for marking with a pen, which can be used to study students' psychology and study learning methods to further improve the efficiency of teaching and educating people. The disadvantage of this method is also due to the limited level of students. Sometimes, no matter how you change it, you can't get rid of some shortcomings or even fallacies of the article, especially for poor students, it is difficult to achieve good results, which teachers should pay attention to. If the other party doesn't take it seriously, the effect will be discounted.
In a word, there are many kinds of composition corrections in Chinese teaching, and they can all be tried as long as they are conducive to improving students' writing level. It is necessary to have the spirit of innovation and to explore constantly in practice in order to find a suitable correction method.