Counting the scenic spots around Xi 'an is vulgar and unsightly. Don't step on these tourist traps.

People often say that China will see Shenzhen in 20 years, China will see Shanghai in 100 years, China will see Beijing in 1000 years, and China will see Xi in 5000 years. In history, there were 13 dynasties in Xi 'an, which was the birthplace of ancient Chinese civilization in the East. Over the years, the ancient capital Xi has also become the most popular tourist destination for domestic tourists. It is undeniable that Xi is rich in historical and cultural heritage, and there are indeed many historical sites worth visiting. But around Xi, there are too many fake scenic spots and historical sites. Most of them are purely artificial, vulgar and unsightly. Have you ever been fooled by these tourist traps?

First of all, I have to say that it is the underground palace of the Qin Mausoleum, which is a completely artificial artificial scenic spot. Has nothing to do with the underground palace of Qin Shihuang's mausoleum. There are no cultural relics, no literature and history materials, and all kinds of crude wax figures are filled, which is completely at the level of small workshops. Ironically, the wax figures are all treated with "beauty", and the red mouth and double eyelids are called spicy eyes. The most important thing is that the tour guide inside can talk. "

Then, in Lintong, there is a set of new tour guide words in recent years, saying that there are three places in Lintong that are most worth seeing: Qin Terracotta Warriors and Horses, Han Hongmen Banquet, Tang Huaqing Pool, the so-called site of Hongmen Banquet, which are all cottage attractions pieced together by local funds, specially for foreign tourists to visit. They won't go there at all. The actors performing in the scenic spots are probably locals, and their lines are completely lip-synching, which has always been embarrassing.

Then there is the so-called eight wonders of the world Pavilion in Lintong, which is a wonderful work rather than a miracle. It is similar to the site of Qin Mausoleum and Hongmen Banquet. This place often does not appear in Xi 'an's guidebook, but under the deception of local black car drivers and black tour guides, foreign tourists are inevitably fooled. In fact, many times, traveling is a waste of money. Most importantly, these cottage attractions have also delayed your precious travel time.

I'm afraid the last one is Ganling. As we all know, among the tombs of ancient emperors in China, except the mausoleum of Qin Shihuang, the rest is probably the dry mausoleum of Wu Zetian, but it happened that someone developed a scenic spot called the dry mausoleum. These fake scenic spots can't even guarantee the minimum authenticity. What about cultural relics and historical value? At best, it can only be regarded as a place for foreign tourists.

For thousands of years, the land of Sanqin has left us countless precious historical and cultural relics. The Terracotta Warriors, the Wild Goose Pagoda and the ancient city walls have left a good impression on countless Chinese and foreign tourists. However, these fake scenic spots around Xi can deceive foreign tourists. The most interesting thing is that these scenic spots are all national 3A scenic spots. Is this a problem of management level or a lag in concept? No matter how good a tourist city is, it can't stand such "waste". For tourists, these shoddy mountain resorts are at best a bad travel experience, but what is the damage to a city?