What are the advantages of students correcting each other's compositions?

First, after many corrections, students not only accurately remember the basic requirements of writing, but also have a deeper understanding of these requirements. He will instruct others how to write and how not to write, which will naturally enhance his writing ability.

Second, everyone has the opportunity to read many students' compositions, so it is easy to find and learn from others' strengths. It is also a good thing to take others' shortcomings as a warning, which gives students an opportunity to communicate with each other and open their hearts.

Third, every time you grade a composition, each person only approves one copy, which is not heavy. Every time you draw lots to change people, the people you approve are fresh and interested. Each student's composition is approved by another student every time, so it is certainly fresh to see different students' comments on themselves. This freshness is conducive to cultivating students' interest in correcting compositions and reading other people's comments.

Fourthly, when correcting compositions, students should think from the perspective of the reviser and the role of the teacher, which is conducive to enhancing students' psychological adaptability, psychological balance and role exchange and promoting their psychological maturity.

Fifth, teachers only look at and read some students' correction results, and read many compositions in a short time, which is beneficial for teachers to think more, maintain a strong interest in reading, and easily stimulate teachers' intellectual potential and creative potential. It can also save a lot of time for marking with a pen, which can be used to study students' psychology and study learning methods to further improve the efficiency of teaching and educating people.

If you observe carefully, you can also find more benefits of cross-grade composition. There is no denying that everything in the world has advantages and disadvantages, and there are gains and losses. Since there are advantages in correcting each other's compositions, there must be disadvantages, especially in the class groups where students' self-education ability is not strong, the disadvantages may be more obvious. If the organization is not well guided, it will be a mess. Because of this, teachers who try out students' peer composition should think carefully, analyze carefully, and guide students to do this work patiently and concretely, so as to promote its advantages and eliminate its disadvantages. 65438+2006, the practice of students' mutual evaluation of compositions tells me that the advantages of mutual evaluation outweigh the disadvantages, which is conducive to cultivating students' ability to correct compositions.