Three arguments: Thank you for asking. Tolstoy said that people are cute not because they are beautiful, but because they are cute. But today, another debater wants to tell you that inner beauty cannot replace outer beauty. We guess the other side will demonstrate from the following three aspects. First, define. The other side said that external beauty has its own unique content in many aspects, such as content implication, expression form and effect, and emphasized its irreplaceable characteristics. Second, the other side attaches great importance to the issue of substitution. They say that substitution needs to be made in many aspects, such as form, effect, content and meaning, otherwise substitution will not be established. Third, social significance. China culture has been pursuing the perfection of both internal and external cultivation. However, modern society needs multi-level and multi-angle evaluators. So inner beauty can't replace outer beauty. Of course, this is only our guess, and we are willing to listen to the arguments of other debaters. thank you
Moderator: Next, let the opposing party send any debater to guess the correct argument. Please wait a minute.
The opponent argued: thank you, but don't worry. We won't ask you to prove absolute substitution. On the contrary, the other side may give us several sets of martial arts moves today to make their arguments look more beautiful. The first trick is to suck the heart. Inhale a part belonging to external beauty or internal and external beauty into internal beauty. It is believed that as long as it comes from the heart, such as temperament and speech, it belongs to inner beauty. The second trick is to change the shadow. Replace "may" in the title with "occasionally" and "sometimes". It is believed that as long as the inner beauty is used instead of the outer beauty in a certain situation and under certain conditions, the other party's point of view can be demonstrated. With the foundation of the above two moves, I can do whatever it takes for convenience, and I will only go all the way to the end. Is there a difference between blindly emphasizing inner beauty and outer beauty? Isn't it all about getting psychological pleasure and realizing the value of life? This shows that it is replaceable. Finally, I hope that both of us can study both inside and outside today and contribute a wonderful debate to you. thank you
Moderator: Next, please ask any player to make a statement in three minutes.
A positive debate: thank you, moderator. Hello, everyone. In June last year, 1 1, the artificial beauty Hao Lulu spent a lot of money on a comprehensive plastic surgery, which aroused strong social repercussions. In May this year, Yang Yuanyuan was turned away from the beauty contest because of plastic surgery. This has once again aroused social discussion. It is precisely because of these phenomena that we are all standing here today to discuss the poetic and serious topic of the beauty of human society. Make the concept clear before the discussion begins. External beauty is also called image beauty, which we think includes physiology, expression, language, action, clothing and so on. And inner beauty is also called spiritual beauty. Specifically, it includes the beauty of morality, sentiment, ideal, will and wisdom. Both of them are the contents of aesthetic subject's understanding of aesthetic object. The difference is that the external beauty can be grasped intuitively, while the internal beauty needs to be gradually displayed in the indirect aesthetic process before it can be recognized by people. So the difference between the two is not essential. We believe that today's so-called substitutability means that the substituted can finally play the same, similar or superior role as the substituted in the same or different ways. Today, our argument that inner beauty can replace outer beauty is mainly based on the following two aspects. First of all, internal beauty can replace external beauty, so that people can get the same or higher aesthetic evaluation as before. God will give everyone a pure heart. But you can't give everyone the same beautiful appearance. However, the spiritual communication between people is that people are people after all. With the deepening of understanding, the inner beauty is profound and shocking, which will eventually bring us aesthetic experience and beauty enjoyment that are the same as or far beyond the outer beauty. A true lover will tell you that you are the most beautiful in my eyes, because he understands your inner self. Secondly, internal beauty can replace external beauty and make people realize the same or higher level of life value as in the past. It is true that everyone loves beauty. Having an outstanding appearance will bring you more opportunities and convenience, but it doesn't matter even if you are plain. You can create opportunities and seize opportunities through intensive training and promotion in the United States. Helen, a blind man, conquered the world by writing her own mind, because inner beauty replaced outer beauty and became an eternal reason. However, in today's society, when plastic surgery has become one of the powerful weapons for social communication and job hunting, and when Southern Weekend lamented that literati are not as beautiful as women, instrumental rationality has gradually become a social photo album. Since society is superficial, China has had such a poem since ancient times, which illustrates a nation's spiritual choice and value orientation. When each of us is faced with regrets and contradictions, only when we realize that inner beauty can replace outer beauty can we be deeper, wiser and cuter. Thank you all.
Moderator: Next, we invite the other party to send any debater to make a statement in three minutes.
Objection: Thank you, Madam President. Hello, everyone. Just now, I heard the beautiful words from the other party, and my thoughts were positive. The other party's manners and clothes were very decent. Does this mean that the other party is a model of both internal and external training? It just shows that our view today is not to advocate judging people by their appearances, but to cultivate both inside and outside. Today, the other party told us what can be replaced? The first is that inner beauty and outer beauty have the same aesthetic pleasure. Today, if I am hungry, it is pleasant to eat and sleep when I am sleepy. Should the other debater tell everyone that eating can replace sleeping? Obviously not. Therefore, today, when we look at whether the inner beauty can replace the outer beauty, we don't force the other party to prove that they are perfect, but that as long as the other party can tell us that the inner beauty can replace the outer beauty in its main function, you will prove your point of view. Today, we also say that the other party is a legal professional, so he must know better than us, and it can have two meanings, one is practical ability, and the other is that objective ability is unconstrained. For example, now they have the ability to speak, but they can't, because the rules restrict them from speaking. What the other party wants to prove today is that inner beauty has the practical ability to replace outer beauty, and people's aesthetic needs also allow such substitution. First of all, the different functions of inner beauty and outer beauty show that they have no way and no ability to replace each other. Inner beauty brings us aesthetic recognition of personality, while outer beauty brings us aesthetic pleasure. When Brother Bao first met Lin Daiyu, he felt that the girl's gorgeous flowers were like water and the willow branches were blowing in the wind. After a long time, I found myself still delicate and clever. Delegation: We can see that their beautiful costumes are visually enjoyable, but their amazing boldness of vision on the field shows another beauty of China athletes. Therefore, the pleasure and recognition brought by inner beauty and outer beauty are different. The second is that people's aesthetic needs do not allow this substitution to happen. For example, when we shoot, we will focus on whether there are external characteristics, and when we write articles, we will focus on whether the internal forces are deep enough. If you choose a spouse, some people may think that girls who are not beautiful like each other, that is, internal beauty replaces external beauty, but it is not. At this time, we just spend time in different eyes and choose different ones according to different needs and preferences. For example, Lu Bu chose The Story Of Diu Sim, a great beauty, and Huang's outstanding talents. Why are we talking about beauty today? Because it is our nature to pursue beauty. Instead of going to shattered glass to talk about whether a person can be replaced, it is better to face it frankly. If I don't do well enough today, I will correct it. The same is true of inner beauty and outer beauty. I believe that everyone who pursues beauty can find a more suitable answer as long as they practice both inside and outside in life. thank you
Moderator: Thank you for your debaters. Next, please ask the judges and teachers to grade, with positive points and negative points. First of all, please ask any debater who stands on the negative side to refute the positive argument for one and a half minutes.
Three opposing arguments: OK, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Hello, everyone. First of all, let's look at the understanding of this word by other debaters today. In fact, they say it is ability, but there is no certification ability. Tell us what it is. But in some cases, in some virtual situations, internal beauty may replace external beauty. Well, if the other debater is so interested in Nenko, then I can do anything today. I said that as long as I had a gun, I could beat Tai Sen in the ring. I said I could tie Yao Ming's hand and beat him on the basketball court. Is this what the other debater said "yes"? So I hope the other debater can help us demonstrate that inner beauty has the ability to replace outer beauty. Secondly, let's look at another debater and tell us why it can be replaced. First of all, the opponent's debater told us that he was full of poetry and self-appreciation. Indeed, I think the eight debaters on both sides are full of poetry and self-appreciation, so why do we need suits and ties? It is precisely because the external beauty brings such respect that the internal beauty cannot be replaced. Another debater told us that it was the same aesthetically. Well, we can say that the model can say that she is beautiful, and the writer can say that she is beautiful, but the model is judged because of her physical beauty. Writers are also recognized for their spiritual beauty. Are these two substitutes? Actually, it's just their respective roles. Third, the opponent used a big and empty concept, as long as the same effect is achieved, it is called substitution. Then if I have a girlfriend today, my mind will have a sense of satisfaction. If I earn money from my work today, my mind will be satisfied. Is it because everyone makes me feel satisfied with the other debater that we are told that money can replace my girlfriend? Obviously not. So I hope the other party will show us that inner beauty has the ability to replace outer beauty and play its role. thank you
Moderator: We ask the parties to send any debater to refute.
Two arguments in favor: thank you, moderator. Hello, everyone. The other debater's accusation against us is based on the following three aspects: First, the other debater thinks that our ability is a virtual ability. Then I want to ask another debater, Helen's example in our debate. In the battle with Tai Sen, is your so-called hammer more important, or is our Helen's example more convincing? Secondly, the other debater thinks that we think they are replaceable because they are exactly the same. The other debater really misunderstood our argument. We think they are essentially the same. Why is it essentially the same? Because they are all the contents of the aesthetic subject's understanding of the aesthetic object. They can all bring us a kind of soul and an external pleasure. Admittedly, there may be subtle differences between this kind of singing and pleasure, but their essence is the same. This qualitative difference can determine that they can be replaced. Finally, the other debater said that it is irreplaceable to feel different. Another debater gave us some examples about suits. You're not wearing a suit, and you're still standing on the platform of this debate. Does the other debater say that we put on suits and show us a wonderful debate with your inner beauty, and you are irreplaceable? Maybe if we wear a suit, we must have an advantage over you. Can't you fix it? So there is no need to argue today. Everyone wears a cotton-padded jacket. I think winning is the most, right? To sum up, our opponents' accusations are all based on a guess. Finally, I want to say that I am not very beautiful, I am ugly but I am gentle, so I firmly believe that inner beauty can represent outer beauty. thank you
Moderator: Next, let any debater of the positive faction refute the theory of the opposing side in one and a half minutes.
Three arguments: thank you, moderator, for your argument just now. We want to do it one by one based on three levels of ability and social atmosphere. First, from the ability. The other party said that the unique aesthetic effect played by external beauty today is beyond the reach of internal beauty. They cited the example of Jia Baoyu's love for Lin Daiyu at first sight. Then let's look at an example of long-lasting love. Why does Huang Rong have a crush on Guo Jing's simplicity? If Huang Rong is not because Guo Jing's inner beauty can replace his outer beauty, how can two people write a romantic and magical knight? Secondly, the other side argues that they are allowed to say that there are some special needs in today's society, which makes it impossible to allow internal beauty to replace external beauty. Let's look at such an example. Actors have unique requirements in the United States, right? Then the other party said that actors were not allowed to replace external beauty with internal beauty. Should we encourage actors not to pay attention to the grasp of the role and emotional experience, but to infect our audience through the outside? Third, the other party and friends argue about social atmosphere. They say both inside and outside, but is both inside and outside more important? Is there a key theory in the two-point theory? Should we emphasize internal and external training and ignore external training? Man is great because his heart can bear the universe. Today, should we advocate a social atmosphere that values inner beauty, moral cultivation and inner strength? Therefore, based on the above three reasons, the argument of the other debater can never give us a full argument that internal beauty can not replace external beauty. thank you
Moderator: Let's ask the opposing side to send any debater to refute the positive rebuttal within one and a half minutes. Thank you.
The opponent thinks that the most important issue for the opponent today is their understanding of the concept of debate, which is substitution. Let's think about the example just given by the other party. Is inner beauty and outer beauty really the so-called substitution relationship? Just like love, the other person is eager to find a way to get love for those who have some shortcomings outside. However, it turns out that love is a matter of different tastes. The other party cited Guo Jing and Huang Rong and asked Guo Jing whether his inner beauty played a role, rather than the so-called external beauty that made Huang Rong fall in love with him. So the other party here is not a substitute relationship at all. Just like Yang Wei and Wang Yifu both have the ability to win the gold medal of our army. Today, Yang Fake played badly, and Wang Yifu showed great courage. The other side will say that Wang Yifu won the gold medal instead of Yang Wei, which is unfair to both sides. Therefore, the example that the other party will give us today is that external beauty should have played a role, but external beauty did not play a role and was replaced by internal beauty. This is the real substitute. The logic of the other party today is very simple, that is, the inner beauty and the outer beauty are essentially the same, so they can replace each other. Even if we admit it, can this be established? Did the other party mention Helen, Helen's ecstasy and Mother Teresa's compassion, which convinced the whole world? But they arouse people's desires and purify people's hearts. Who can replace these two kinds of beauty? Therefore, even if the other side's standards are established today, there is no logic of the other side. thank you
Moderator: After watching our second round of defensive counter-attack, please ask the nine judges and teachers present to rate the pros and cons. Now the opponent's total score is divided into the following points: hand-to-hand combat, starting from professional players.
Four arguments: Thank you, moderator. I want to ask another debater such a question. In social life, I want to get positive comments from society. Can inner beauty get such a positive evaluation instead of outer beauty?