The first is the group round robin (actually there is only one group, needless to say). Team seven is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Three games a day, one team bye. This is the most troublesome place (just like the Super League). It's actually no trouble. Let me teach you a trick. You can imagine that there are eight teams and arrange the schedule. So the schedule is as follows (12 means 1 team plays 2 teams, and this is written for convenience, which is understandable anyway:
Day 1: 12, 34, 56, 7 Bye-bye;
The next day: 13, 24, 57, 6 Bye-bye;
Day 3: 14, 23, 67, 5 Bye-bye;
Day 4: 27, 36, 45, 1 bye;
Day 5: 15, 26, 37, 4 Bye;
Day 6: 16, 25, 47, 3 Bye;
Day 7: 17, 35, 46, 2 Bye;
This is a single round robin system, but it is unfair to the last team or the team in front. After all, if they play a game every day, they will play for six days in a row, so the more favorable it is for the team going to China bye, so I suggest taking a day off after playing for two days. In this way, the next day, the fourth day, the sixth day, after these three days, we will take a day off, that is, we will take three days off for ten days.
Option 1: Play 10 single round robin first, and then be ranked out, so that there can be a round of elimination (this is fairer, then the top ranked team will also have a chance to compete for the championship, which is the case in NBA league). Before the round robin, four players can take part in the knockout round. The first player competes with the fourth player, and the second player competes with the first player to determine the final number and ranking.
So after the round robin, we have a day off. On 12, two semi-finals will be held to decide the winner. On 13 (if we have time to have a day off for the final, there will be a total of *** 14 days of competition, with 9 days off and 5 days off), and the champion will be decided, ranking third and fourth. Therefore, there are ***25 performances, with * * 13 days (or 14 days, choose by yourself).
The second option is to rank directly after the round robin. This plan * * * counts as 2 1 play for ten days. Although this scheme takes less time, I think the first scheme is more reasonable (if there is enough time, I suggest using the first scheme). After all, there are strong teams in the round robin, and they can compete for the championship through elimination (of course, there is no way without the top four teams, and those teams can't be really strong).
If there are teams with the same record in the round robin, and the two teams have the same record, it depends on the relationship between the winners and losers in their direct competition (when each team has played the round robin), and whoever wins ranks first; If there are three or more teams with the same record, it depends on the winning or losing points of those teams, and the net winning score is high. For example, 1 team, 1, 2, 3 have the same record, so it depends on the three games between them. 1 win two teams 10 points, 2 wins, 3 points and 3 wins for three teams. 1 team score 10- 15=-5 (winning points-losing points), team 2 scored 3- 12=-7, team 3 scored 15-3= 12. Who is it? As far as the net victory of the three teams is concerned, the score is positive, so the three teams rank first, followed by 1 team (-5) and the second team last (-7), so it is ok. What should I do if I can't tell at this time? For example, the net winning score of the three teams is 12, and the team's 2 1 is -6, so the three teams are obviously static. Who is taller ranks first. If it is still the same, there is only a third way, that is, to see the winning and losing relationship between 1 and 2. Whoever wins the confrontation between them ranks first, and the third method will definitely be separated. Generally, the net winning points between the first teams can be ranked. Of course, anything is possible, so I will elaborate. The record of four teams is the same as that of three teams. Like the record of four teams, the first team is divided (or the last team is divided first), and the third team cannot be divided by a small net victory. Then the remaining three teams are divided in the same way as the above three teams, so generally speaking, they are all solved one by one, and there is always a way. Not to mention more than five teams.
The above is the competition system, which is very detailed and basically covers everything. First, you have to choose what the plan is, then you have to agree on the competition system with each team, give them a table of the competition system, let them know the schedule, and finally, the question of how to rank is OK.