Five cave explorers were trapped in the cave. They were short of water and food and could never be rescued in a short time. In order to survive and rescue, everyone agreed to draw lots to eat one of them and sacrifice him to save the other four. Witmore was the original proponent of the plan, but he withdrew his opinion before the draw. The other four people still insisted on drawing lots, and only chose whitmore as the victim. After being rescued, the four men were charged with murder and sentenced to be hanged by the court of first instance. This is a hypothetical case solved by American jurist Fuller published in Harvard Law Review in the 20th century. Fuller further invented the decisions of five judges of the Supreme Court's Court of Appeal. This famous case-solving has become a compulsory course for students of western law schools in the future, and more cases have been deduced on this basis. 1998, the jurist Saber continues Fuller's game. Assuming that this case has a chance to be overturned in fifty years, the other nine justices have already made their own judgments on this case. Are they really guilty? Please look at the judgments of the fourteen judges. In fact, these judgments reflect the philosophy of law of various schools in the 20th century, just like a feast of philosophy of law, which makes readers taste wonderful and touching profound thinking. Cultivate the legal quality to adapt to the society ruled by law.
For details, please refer to The Strange Cave Case: Nine New Views written by Saber (translated by Chinese mainland as The Strange Cave Case and translated by Hong Kong Commercial Press as Fourteen Judgments of the Strange Cave Case). This book is not only a fable classic in the field of philosophy of law, but also an ideal reader for interdisciplinary general education in universities. This book is suitable for readers who are interested in serious and meaningful arguments instead of being keen on labeling opinions or exploring fantasies.