First, the accuracy of language.
In the interview of civil servants, the examination of questions is particularly important, so we must grasp the key words in the interview questions, especially in the absence of the question book, and remember the key words well. Then quickly identify the question types, seize the test sites, and carry out the overall conception.
Whether the language expression in the interview is accurate or not depends on the accurate grasp and rational analysis of the interview questions. If the understanding of the topic itself is wrong, it is bound to be impossible to answer accurately. Therefore, the examination of questions is the most important prerequisite in the interview. Only by doing this step well can we effectively complete other aspects, otherwise it will be easy to answer irrelevant questions, gild the lily and even make people confused.
Examining questions is skillful, especially in such a relatively tense and serious environment, it is really difficult for candidates to fully remember and master the examiner's questions. How to solve this problem? Start with the key words. By memorizing the key words in the interview questions and then making a general analysis in your mind, we can help us identify the problems in time and effectively, so as to prescribe the right medicine.
The above only provides the necessary premise for the accurate expression of language. Candidates should not rush to answer questions as soon as they grasp the key words, but also make a comprehensive conception of the examination questions and connect countless scattered points in series to form a close and orderly overall language and thinking network.
Finally, we should pay special attention to the use of words, try to explain the problem in soft language and euphemistic tone, and avoid using absolute words. For example, answer the examiner's question: "What kind of person do you hate the most?" Some candidates replied: "I hate hypocritical people the most." If it is replaced by: "As the saying goes, the ruler is short and the inch is long. I don't particularly hate people, but I really don't like dishonest people. " In fact, the two statements express the same meaning, but give people different feelings. Therefore, the teacher of the National Civil Service Network suggested that candidates should use more negative words and positive words instead of derogatory words.
Second, the integrity of language.
Language integrity is an important part of language expression in civil servant interviews. During the interview, candidates should finish what they started and answer questions completely to avoid anticlimactic or digression. Some candidates blindly answer questions after hearing the examiner's questions without thinking and forming a complete framework, which will inevitably lead to digression. This may be related to a person's personality and habits. For example, candidates who are impatient or usually love to grab words are prone to make such mistakes. Candidates can consciously control and cooperate in their daily life, because temporary control alone in the examination room is difficult to work, and it will also lead to excessive mental stress, slip numbers and other phenomena, which is not conducive to the examination. Therefore, the teacher of the national civil servant network suggested that while thinking, the overall framework should be listed first, and then the content should be filled in. Most candidates only said half when answering questions, because they didn't think about the questions as a whole. The function of the outline is a clue to guide you to think and express in this direction. First, think about the overall framework, at least make sure that the questions are answered from beginning to end, so as not to have nothing to say halfway. In addition, the process of sketching is also the process of determining the central argument, which can be described as killing two birds with one stone.
In addition, it should be noted that under the premise of clarifying the examiner's questions, candidates should quickly conceive relevant points and try to outline the framework and context of answering this question, such as first determining which aspects to answer, which is the main one, which is the second one, which is the second one, which is the first one and which is the last one, and so on. In order to make an outline and then discuss it separately. Keeping the outline and the overall framework in mind can effectively avoid the embarrassing scene of having nothing to say in the process of answering questions.
Thirdly, the flexibility of language.
The flexibility of language is a further requirement based on the accuracy and completeness of language. We often see many articles written clearly and accurately, but we always feel that something is missing. Such articles are usually too straightforward and lack continuity, and it is difficult to arouse the interest of others. The same is true in the interview. If you just talk in general terms, you will lose your language expression without or without transitional words. Therefore, in the whole interview process, including sentence to sentence, paragraph to paragraph, and even question to question transition, transition and cohesion must be coherent and flexible.
Aware of this, it is not difficult to achieve flexible language expression, catch people's eyes and attract the audience. The most effective way is to use interlanguage reasonably. On the one hand, you should pay attention to the fact that in the whole examination process, besides the language of your answers, there are many things to say, such as greeting the examiner when you enter the examination room for the first time, prompting the examiner before answering the questions, making a concluding speech after answering the questions, and making clear what you want to say when you leave the examination room. On the other hand, we should pay attention to the use of conjunctions we have learned before in the process of answering questions. The use of interlanguage, such as coordinate relation, turning relation and progressive relation, can effectively connect and integrate scattered words. It can not only ensure the overall integrity of the language, but also be wonderful and orderly. The clever use of interlanguage will add a lot of color to your overall expression and leave a very deep impression on the interviewer.
Fourth, the richness of language.
Many candidates have a framework when thinking about problems, but there is nothing to fill in, that is, the language is not rich enough. In fact, candidates can use examples, quotations, cause analysis, negative arguments and other methods to discuss. Specific can start from the following points.
In a discussion, there must be a sub-argument. We can use different methods and forms to expand the sub-argument. For example, when we demonstrate our views, we can use examples to support our views, so that the content expressed can be implemented; You can also cite famous sayings of sages, anecdotes of celebrities and idioms to demonstrate. But the premise is that we must accurately understand the true meaning of these examples, famous sayings, anecdotes and idioms and allusions, and ensure their accurate use, of course, we must not use too much; In addition, cause analysis is also a method often used in argumentation. By analyzing the causes of the incident, I put forward my own views and suggestions. Cause analysis can be carried out in many ways, such as from the perspective of facts, experience and data. It is worth mentioning that candidates can also use the method of negative argument. This point is often overlooked by candidates, such as: "We should save water, if not, the last drop of water that human beings see will be their own tears". If the negative argument is used properly, I believe it will have unexpected effects.
Verb (abbreviation of verb) language logic
Logic is the soul of the whole language expression, and it is also the highest level requirement in the whole language expression. Without logic, the accuracy, completeness, flexibility and richness of language cannot be realized.
In fact, whether speaking orally or in writing, logic is very important, so the logic of language has also become a consideration in the interview. Whether there is complete and strict logic will directly affect the examiner's impression and evaluation of candidates. You can simply imagine that it is also a warehouse, and the sense of order and disorder is completely different. Whether the language is logical or not gives the examiner the same feeling. So the logic of language and thinking is very important. If you want to let the examiner know you and remember you in a relatively short time, logic is essential.
The most important point of logic is clarity and orderliness, and clarity is the most direct expression of logic. This not only requires us to consciously cultivate in our daily life and study, but also requires us to have a general grasp of the content expressed in the interview process, then quickly determine the priorities, and effectively use interlanguage to achieve effective links, and finally express it through rich and vivid language to realize the logic of the language.