Table tennis civil war coaches don't play.

In international competitions and civil wars, there is no coach present, which is one of the national table tennis practices and fine traditions. Strategically speaking, it is mainly because table tennis advocates collectivism. Although it encourages intra-team competition, intra-team competition is mainly carried out at the level of athletes, and the coaching staff is a resource for everyone to some extent. Coaches can often be seen sitting outside international competitions, serving athletes who are not their bosses. Therefore, there is no off-site guidance in the civil war, and the first signal transmitted is that the national table tennis coaching team is the same resource for all athletes, without favoritism or justifying shortcomings. The team emphasizes technical exchange and there is no vicious competition. The advantage of this is that if I win my teammates, I will definitely win by strength, not the high level of the coach. The achievements are hard-won, the self-confidence won is real, and the medals won are flawless. Tactically, the coach can help you for a while (just between the game and the timeout), but it can't help you for a lifetime. There is no off-court civil war, but also the training of athletes' analysis and adjustment ability. Of course, it is not always without exceptions. In training and informal competitions, the coaching staff will guide the competition for various reasons, usually to educate and train athletes.